If/Then
Pantages Theatre
The premise of If/Then—composer Tom Kitt and book writer–lyricist Brian Yorkey’s follow-up to their 2009 Next to Normal,
which featured the most intelligent book and score since the dawn of
the millennium—is almost as clever and richly complex as that
groundbreaking Tony- and Pulitzer-winning debut. Comparisons of their
pioneering work to that of Stephen Sondheim and Jason Robert Brown are
more than justified; their auspicious partnership contributes to the
evolution of modern musical theater, helping it crash into our new
century and leave all those gooey and groan-inducing Rogers and
Hammerstein relics in the dust of that far simpler time before the
American Dream proved itself to be a hallucination.
Written for and around the considerable talents of its star, Idina Menzel, If/Then
tells two stories simultaneously, speculating what might have happened
if their heroine, Elizabeth, had made one turn or another at one
seemingly inconsequential moment. Relocating to Manhattan from Phoenix
after a long and disastrous marriage, Elizabeth meets two friends in
Madison Square Park: the freewheeling Kate (LaChanze), who suggests she
call herself Liz as she takes on an all-new, swingin’-single, urban
persona; and Lucas (Anthony Rapp), an old flame from college who thinks
she should assume the more professional and mature name Beth,
encouraging her to join him as a political and environmental activist.
As she ponders whether to stay in the park with Kate, listening to a
busker play his guitar, or accompany Lucas to march in a rally, Yorkey’s
script veers in each direction. For the next two and a half hours, we
see how the life of Liz/Beth, both played by the remarkable Menzel,
would have drastically altered depending on which road she decides to
take. While Beth chooses to throw herself into her career and not-so
subtly pursue her married boss Stephen (Daren A. Herbert), Liz is
approached by Josh (James Snyder), a sweet young soldier just home from
the Middle East who is immediately smitten by her.
The tracking of Liz’s and Beth’s
drastically varying paths is at times confusing, especially as her
friends and romantic partners’ lives transform right along with her own.
In one track, Kate marries then divorces her girlfriend Anne (Janine
DiVita), while in the other they stay together. Lucas finds happiness
with David (Marc Delacruz), introduced to him by Josh along Beth’s
journey, while, in the other track, he ends up miserable and alone since
his long-percolating love for Beth stays unrequited.
The most poignant of all the intersecting relationships comes when
Liz surrenders to her feelings for Josh, the clumsy young Midwestern kid
who has no agenda beyond being with her forever. “Why are you so
awkward?” she asks him when they first meet and he fumbles his wooing
techniques miserably. “I’m from Nebraska,” he quickly explains. “I’m
kinda normal there.” Her feelings for him blossom despite her reluctance
to fall in love again, which excites her as it scares her to death. He
insists being together is their destiny, but she quickly disagrees. “I
don’t think it’s fate,” she responds. “I think it’s you.”
The road is long and fractured for Liz and Beth—one that might make
audiences more willing to ride along if it were told a little more
quickly. The wildly kinetic and eye-catching staging of director Michael
Greif helps assuage this somewhat, as does Yorkey and Kitt’s gracious
decision to offer the excellent and committed ensemble cast individual
cameo moments and knockout solos. As an ever-changing eclectic flood of
busy New Yorkers of all social strata, the supporting players
continually pass through both stories as Mark Wendland’s impressive
high-tech set morphs to become one location after another.
Menzel is a force of nature, no
doubt, although by the end of Act 1 it’s hard to give a hang about
either of her personas, as Liz and Beth share one annoying trait:
rampant self-absorption. In fact, only Snyder’s Josh is a character who,
by intermission, we are left to care about—a testament to his
effortless charisma and laidback talent. In the second act, however, Liz
and Beth stop whining, Lucas stops being so annoying and pushy we wish
she would drop him as a friend, and Kate’s too-effervescent good cheer
deepens and matures. DiVita and Herbert do their best and grow
exponentially in their basically underwritten roles, while Delacruz’s
David never stops being superficial and irritatingly grand, especially
in a sappy duet with Rapp called “Best Worst Mistake,” one of the first
things to cut if anyone ever decides to perform surgery on the script.
Act 2 reverses any thought that maybe If/Then should be called If/Ever —or maybe just What/Ever.
Neither Liz nor Beth has it easy along the way, evident when the
idyllic nature of Liz’s life with Josh takes a heartbreaking turn.
Although at times, in Act 1, Menzel seems to be walking through the
performance without much real passion, as though perhaps she’s been
playing the role(s) too long to muster any fervor, she later rises
majestically from whiny and selfish to show Liz and Beth as true
survivors, knocking her characters’ final show-stopping 11th-hour
ballad, “Always Starting Over,” right out of the park.
Kitt and Yorkey write song cycles,
not pop tunes. Thus there are no cute little happy tunes to hum on the
way home. This score isn’t meant to accomplish that for a minute. Few of
us live lives that progress smoothly and without pain or
disappointment. As Beth says to her fresh young new assistant Elena (a
too-brief turn beautifully played by Kyra Faith), who wonders if she’s
said something to offend her boss in her hiring interview, “I’m not
angry at you. I’m angry at myself at your age.”
If/Then
is not only about choices; it’s about whether any choice we make
ultimately can be looked back on as right or wrong. As Liz tells Josh as
he’s redeployed to fight in another war, “Fuck you for making me think
that life may be fair.” If one comes away hearing that message loud and
clear, Kitt and Yorkey have accomplished something important and
revelatory, which the true meaning of creating art.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
December 16, 2015
Kurios
Cirque du Soleil at Dodger Stadium
Now
in its 32nd year, Cirque du Soleil has done far more than reenergize
and revisualize the concept of the circus as it was known through the
ages. Originating in 1982 with founder Gilles Ste-Croix leading a ragtag
group of eager young buskers wowing the tourists by juggling, walking
on stilts, and breathing a bit of fire on the streets of Quebec’s
Baie-Saint-Paul, those modest beginnings sprouted faster than Jack’s
beanstalk to become one of the most successful and consistently prolific
entertainment enterprises in modern history.
Best yet, from the start, Ste-Croix and co-founder Guy Laliberte, one
of his original performers, determined they could keep their show
traveling the globe in a highly advanced version of the traditional
circus tent, but vowed to conjure their unique magic—complete with
aerialists, colorful costuming, and cotton candy for sale on the way
into the bleachers—without featuring a single imprisoned animal
deserving more respect and a much freer quality of life.
For the umpteenth time since the
two brought their fantastical extravaganza to Los Angeles—the first US
city the troupe ever played in 1987, arriving without enough funds to
even return to Canada if the show failed—the now world-famous Cirque
returns. This time the show is Kurios: Cabinet of Curiosities, finding a splendid and far more accessible venue than usual: the parking lot of the out-of-season Dodger Stadium.
Some of the concepts invented to spawn whatever meager storyline
weaves through each of the Cirque’s many touring productions have been
thin at best throughout the years. But Kurios
has a delightful Victorian-inspired premise: In the latter half of the
19th century, a scholarly inventor type called The Seeker (Anton Valen)
goes through his vast cabinet of eclectic steampunk-y treasures in
search of a hidden, invisible world.
On Stephane Roy’s resplendent set, creatures and mechanical
oddities come to life in a sensorially stunning kind of Jules
Verne–meets–Mad Max world, complete with otherworldly creatures and
robots, flying bicycles, a tiny theater featuring performing human
fingers breakdancing as they’re projected on the side of a gigantic
balloon, an upside-down dinner party gone wild celebrated 70 feet over
our heads, and a plethora of intricate makeshift mechanical apparatuses
that could rival anything ever conjured by Betty Boop’s granddaddy
himself.
Of course, the traditional circus
acts are not missed along the way either—including performances by
seemingly boneless contortionists, unearthly acrobats, and Cirque’s
usual and always timeless Banquine and Chinese Pole acts. Under the
kinetic leadership of writer-director Michel Laprise, dance
choreographer Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui, and a quartet of talented acrobatic
designers (Yaman Okur, Ben Potvin, Susan Gaudreau, and Andrea Ziegler), Kurios is the freshest, most irresistible Cirque du Soleil creation in many years.
With whimsical costuming by Philippe Guillotel reminiscent of his brilliant designs for LA’s late-lamented “permanent” show Iris
and featuring a haunting and contagious Mediterranean Bossa Nova–tinged
score by musical directors Raphael Beau and the singularly named team
of Bob & Bill, Kurios is without a doubt a most welcome holiday gift for Los Angeles, all tied up in a neat little bow about the size of Texas.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
December 10, 2015
Miravel
Sacred Fools Theater
Without
a doubt, writer-performer Jake Broder has created memorable and
amazingly eclectic musical divertissements over the past decade-plus,
including performing in his one-man show His Royal Highness Lord Buckley and Louis & Keely: Live at the Sahara,
which also began at Sacred Fools and subsequently traveled—and
continues to travel. Now Broder returns home to the Fools to debut his
newest work. And like his previous efforts, nothing about it is safe
nor, despite its theme lifted directly from Edmond Rostand’s Cyrano de Bergerac, is there anything proffered one would expect.
Under director Shaunessey Quinn, Broder steps solidly into the
leading role of Alphonso Bloch, a physically challenged and painfully
introverted jazz composer who plays his tragic Cyrano to Will Bradley’s
more desirable Christian, creating spectacular musical compositions so
his emotionally unavailable friend can win the heart of his maiden
fair—you know, the maiden Alphonso adores but is too shy and withdrawn
to pursue. Still, Alphonso, often left lurking behind the action,
sitting quietly at his piano watching the chase unfold, understands life
better than the others. As he ruminates, watching Bradley’s Henry
Brooks woo Devereau Chumrau’s Terpsichorean heroine Miravel, “The heart
wants, the body obeys, and the mind suffers.”
The story isn’t new; the treatment
of it is. Broder uses his own incredibly rich jazz pieces to retell the
classic tale, churning out striking original compositions with the help
of an onstage combo: Colin Kupka on sax, Kenny Elliott on drums, and,
at the performance reviewed, Jonathan Kirsh on bass substituting for
Michael Alvidrez. Broder is not only an arresting composer and a
knockout pianist, he is a truly gifted actor; his simple, charmingly
unadorned performance makes his character as much the heart of this
production as his own unforgettable music.
The archetypal foil to Broder’s underplayed Alphonso is Bradley, who
seems to be channeling all the quirky movements and Napoleonic preening
of a young James Cagney as the cocky Henry, the psychologically
tormented minor radio singer whose vocal stylings are a lot smoother
than his rather clumsy womanizing or his violent mood swings. Bradley is
phenomenal in his musical moments, whether they be scatting through
Broder’s own compositions or reinterpreting a couple of wonderful old
standards thrown into the mix: strikingly jazzy arrangements of
Gershwin’s “Summertime” and “Our Love Is Here to Stay.” Bradley is a
fearless performer, a quality without which Miravel would fall flat. If someday he doesn’t play the equally too-cool and conflicted lead in a revival of Pal Joey, it would truly be a cryin’ shame.
As the title character, Alphonso
and Henry’s majestically beautiful and graceful object of desire, dancer
Chumrau is physically perfect in the role and obviously knows exactly
where her character must travel to find her real amore. Still, one might
wish she trusted her instincts more at times and knew that her audience
is right behind her without needing to work so hard to elucidate
Miravel’s confusing crawl through the thorny brambles of love. This is
something an actor cannot accomplish without the guidance of a director
who can see what she can’t and help her dial things down a tad, but
there’s a lot of room for Chumrau, with the aid of Quinn, to explore as
she grows into the role.
This brings up the hope that Broder and his exceptionally talented team continue to see Miravel
as a work-in-progress. There’s so much promise here, but the production
and Broder’s script still needs a bit of polishing to make it as
innovative and stunningly rich as the music and the mood it so
eloquently creates.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
November 30, 2015
Wood Boy Dog Fish
Rogue Artists Ensemble at Bootleg Theater
This
darkly macabre adult retelling of the legend of Pinocchio is so
visually dazzling and so filled with ingenious, spectacularly colorful
marvels that the originality conjured by this company is alone worth the
price of admission. Now, if only Chelsea Sutton’s script were vaguely
as fascinating as the resourceful energy and imagination expended by the
members of Rogue Artists Ensemble, who decorously explain themselves to
be a unique troupe of “hyper-theatrical” designers and
multidisciplinary artists who collectively create imagistic enchantment
from scratch.
Utilizing ancient storytelling techniques—such as dance, masks,
music, and above all puppetry—combined with modern technology gleaned
from digital media, interactive sets, and sophisticated theatrical
illusions, the Rogues are courageous and, luckily for their grateful
audience, work totally without filter.
François-Pierre Couture’s fanciful
and highly versatile set design, enhanced immeasurably by Dallas
Nichols’s stunning videos, transforms Bootleg Theater’s converted
warehouse space from Geppetto’s eclectic workroom to the bottom of the
ocean to the ominous Dogfish’s creepy amusement park with the help of
the über-enthusiastic cast members who move mountains—albeit cardboard
mountains—and manage quick changes into Kerry Hennessy and Lori Meeker’s
whimsical costuming to become fantastical cats, foxes, fish, and
deliciously wild underwater creatures.
The masks were fabricated, according to the program, with the
participation of an enormous number of company members. They are
mind-blowing, and the puppetry, especially that for the infamous wooden
boy with the growing nose (a string-less marionette manipulated from
behind by three performers dressed head-to-toe in black) is
extraordinary. The deep sea section of this production is populated by
huge gorgeously feathery fish on poles, swimming around the stage
manipulated by actors on their backs lying across giant skateboards. And
when Pinocchio finds himself lured onto a frightening nightmare
carnival ride, 3D glasses (available at check-in for a $1 “suggested
donation”) are meant to enhance the audience’s experience.
The trouble here is that the
storyline seems to have been developed around the special effects rather
than the other way around. As visually mesmerizing as the production
design is, Pinocchio’s journey oddly becomes about as dry and boring in
places as watching paint dry. Sections appear to have been created
because the Rogues had gimmicks to add—great ones notwithstanding—as
well as wonderfully bizarre creatures or costuming to introduce.
But under director Sean T. Cawelti, little effort appear to have been
spent to develop the classic tale or to justify some of the
inexplicably broad acting choices made by his actors. Stylized
performances are certainly acceptable when presenting such nonrealistic
fare, but those performances must be consistent rather than individually
indulgent.
Although it’s fun to watch the
spirited and talented ensemble suggestively wrestle a kick-line of
blow-up sex dolls or dueling with swords made from balloon animals, it
doesn’t exactly translate to satisfying storytelling. And even though
patrons were told at the entrance they would be informed when to don
their 3D specs, the performance reviewed was the victim of a missed cue,
so how the 3D section usually unfolds, presumably on Pinocchio’s scary
ride through the dastardly amusement park, must remain a mystery in this
review.
Still, Wood Boy Dog Fish
is wondrous in so many ways. Though clearly geared for adults—Pinocchio
has his feet burned off before being hung by the neck and left to swing
throughout intermission—in our media-saturated society it’s unlikely
children’s innocence would be compromised. So unless you’re raising your
kiddies in a hermetically sealed Plexiglas capsule, they might not need
to be left out of the fun.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
November 16, 2015
The Painted Rocks at Revolver Creek
Fountain Theatre
If
there was any doubt that Athol Fugard is our planet’s greatest living
playwright, the arrival of his newest, most personal, and most arresting
play cinches that distinction. Debuting at Fountain Theatre, the place
the esteemed South African writer has called his “artistic home on the
West Coast” for many years now, this play brings the message of his
life’s labors full circle. As always in his work, he gives voice to the
problems caused by the apartheid system in his country before the system
collapsed in 1994, but here he also chronicles its aftermath and the
whole new set of problems that developed since then—as viewed from both
sides of the issue.
In the late 1950s, while working as a clerk in a Native
Commissioners’ Court in Johannesburg, Fugard was shocked by the
injustices implemented by his fellow Afrikaners’ structure of racial
segregation and enforced through legislation by the National Party.
Fugard’s voluminous output of anti-apartheid opinions brought him
directly into scary conflict with the government. To avoid prosecution
and the threats on his life and that of his family, his plays were for
years produced and published outside of South Africa, only presented
covertly in his homeland in church basements and the living rooms of
private homes.
His newest work is based on a true story, that of aging outsider
artist Nukain Mabuza (a charmingly charismatic Thomas Silcott), a black
worker on a farm owned by ultraconservative Afrikaners in the Mpumalanga
Province in the early 1980s. Mabuza put his passions and frustrations
with his lot in life into creating a vibrant “garden of flowers,”
painting designs directly on the massive rocks of his patron’s barren
land. His zest for this unique primitive expression is stymied by one
huge boulder dominating the area, the last one he hasn’t turned into
gorgeously gaudy and evocative piece of folk art.
“Two Sundays now we come here with
everything, but Tata does nothing,” Mabuza’s 10-year-old adoring
apprentice Bokkie (Phillip Solomon in a monumental and instantly
memorable LA stage debut) gently scolds the old man. “He just sits and
stares at the Big One.” Pestered by the boy, Mabuza begins to work on
what would soon become his last creation. But, instead of the colorful
geometric circles and squares energizing his previous work (beautifully
re-created here on Jeffrey MacLaughlin’s starkly austere set by local
artist Clairfoster Josiah Browne), he starts by painting on huge square
eyes, letting his nemesis rock see what he’s up to as he tries to tell
his simple life story on its rough stone surface. “Can you show me, Big
One, where my home is?” Mabuza asks the rock. “I’ve still got no home.”
His efforts are thwarted by a visit to the site by the landowner’s
wife, Elmarie Kleynhans (Suanne Spoke). Although she has great affection
for the old man and has let him express himself on her beloved terrain,
she demands he wipe off the strangely out-of-place design and get back
to his original quest. Bokkie quickly and vocally defends his mentor’s
bold expression, leading the mistress to demand Mabuza take off his belt
and give the boy a whipping, spitting out, “I will not have some little
klonkie [an ugly, patronizing apartheid-era term for a black child]
with a head full of nonsense telling me what to do.” Mabuza’s meek
acceptance of his mistress’ demands frustrates the boy, born too late to
totally understand the ravages of a long and difficult life spent
living in privation, dependency, and racism. Bokkie can only hope that,
sometime in the future, Mrs. Kleynhans and her husband will “open their
eyes and see us.”
As Act 2 unfolds, it is now 2003. Although Mabuza died only a few
days after that first encounter and Bokkie soon after ran away from the
plantation, the man’s garden of silent flowers is still there, albeit
dirt-covered and the paint faded away, choked by weeds and dead foliage.
A new figure, a grown man named Jonathan Sejake (Gilbert Glenn Browne)
enters the scene with a backpack stuffed with paint cans, ready to try
to re-create Mabuza’s last work on the Big One, the creation the older
man called the “story of his life.”
After Sejake is interrupted by
Mrs. Kleynhans brandishing a pistol pointed directly at him, the true
meaning of Fugard’s masterpiece begins to unfold. Soon the patrona
realizes that Sejake is actually the grown Bokkie, now a principal of a
school in an adjacent province. The two spit venomous accusations at
each other—she as a woman in mortal terror of being forced off her land
or, worse, brutally murdered as her Afrikaner neighbors were, he
desperately trying to make her understand the fierce importance of
remembering his old friend and restoring his legacy just to prove the
old man was there, that he existed, that he mattered.
Just when you think things could not get better than being a fly on a
rock observing the scenario so lovingly and sweetly created by Silcott
and the pintsized Solomon, Spoke and Brown take over the stage, and
their time together is pure unadulterated theatrical magic. Every word
from Brown comes directly from emotions surely stored deep inside him,
and Spoke, in a tour-de-force performance as the conflicted Afrikaner
who doubts the ferocity of her own beliefs, is sure to break your heart.
This is Fugard’s most important and most eloquent play in years. As
Fugard said in an interview on NPR, “At this moment in our history, the
stories that need telling are more urgent than any of the stories that
needed telling during the apartheid years.” Thanks to this monumentally
simple and jarringly evocative production, beautifully interpreted by a
stellar cast under the gossamer, sweepingly subtle yet impassioned
direction of the wondrous Simon Levy, this is also the production of the
year in Los Angeles, not to mention the best ensemble cast of 2015.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
November 9, 2015
The Shoplifters
Victory Theatre Center
Canadian
playwright Morris Panych is far better-known and better-awarded in our
close-but-yet-so-far neighbor to the north. But if LA theaterlovers take
advantage of the unique opportunity to see the West Coast debut of one
of his most hilariously perverse plays, presented under the sharply
cagey watch of director Maria Gobetti, the writer’s star might rise
quickly over our western climes.
Double-sided tape being nothing as reliable as it once was, seasoned
shoplifter Alma (Kathy Bailey) is caught stuffing a 16-oz. rib eye steak
under her skirt by the supermarket’s awkward security guard–in-training
Dom (Alex Genther). She and her decidedly more traumatized and
reluctant accomplice Phyllis (Wendy Johnson) are herded into the back
room of the supermarket, only to have the novice crime-stopper quickly
placed more on the defensive than the offensive. Alma, who admits she is
“at the top of her game” in the petty theft business, immediately
begins to blast the painfully gung-ho young rookie for his impertinence
rather than exhibiting any contrition, reminding him that even
Prometheus stole fire from the gods—and after all is said and done, that
didn’t turn out to be such a bad thing.
There’s nothing in the emotionally
breakable kid’s training manual that helps him deal with the situation,
as the chapter on what to do when meat falls out of a customer’s
underwear seems to have been omitted. Luckily, Dom is confident he can
rely on the expertise of his colleague Otto (Steve Hofvendahl), the
older security guard who’s been showing him the ropes between frequent
eye-rolls at his charge’s Dudley Do-Right attitude. Unfortunately, that
lesson might still be hard to come by, as Otto has been watching Alma
steal from the market on a regular basis without ever stopping her, his
professional duties compromised because he has developed a massive crush
on her right through the monitor of the store’s surveillance system.
Under Gobetti’s precise leadership, her three notable veteran
performers are remarkably comfortable with Panych’s often hyperbolic
rat-a-tat of nonstop humor. Bailey has the especially difficult task of
making the cornered Alma, almost eagerly ready to take on the situation
and talk her way out of an arrest, appear hardened yet intensely
vulnerable. She’s a woman ready to discuss the “whole structure of the
market economy,” if necessary, but not before reminding her captors they
don’t have the crime on tape and besides, she and her apprentice
certainly don’t have time for all that. Phyllis has to get to the job
she loves as a hatcheck girl at a local club and she herself has to
continue fighting her private battle with the Big C.
Hofvendahl makes an exceptional foil for Bailey’s hardened Alma,
sweetly relatable as the world-weary, desperately tired lifelong
security guard (“If they passed their cop exams,” Alma tells Phyllis,
“they wouldn’t be working here”) ready to chuck it all, especially after
the new store manager lets him go for giving a shoplifting homeless kid
a pass. With Hofvendahl’s wonderfully understated delivery, Otto
becomes a perfect example of someone who once wanted to change the world
but now, after 30 years toiling dutifully as an unappreciated worker
drone surviving within the corporate system, just wants to leave the
room with a little dignity.
As the somewhat dim-bulb and fragile Phyllis, Johnson is delightful
and totally amazing, offering an exaggerated, truly over-the-top
performance that for some reason works. Few actors can create a
character as broadly—and bravely—as Johnson, getting away with much more
than others because everything she does, every face she makes or line
she croaks out like a whiny, overgrown, overtired 4-year-old, originates
from a deep-down base of supreme reality. Genther, however, a rookie in
this exceptional company of performers and obviously as raw as his
character, is not as lucky. He could be the quintessential Dom if he
just trusted himself and what he’s got to offer physically in his role,
not work so darn hard to be funny. Still, he obviously has a unique
talent just ready to blossom, so hopefully he will learn from working
with his trio of well-honed co-stars.
Of course, the big question here,
which Panych explores with an achingly sharp eye for contemporary humor,
is whether the “imbalances of the world can be corrected by a can of
stolen tuna,” especially when the perpetrator believes all she was doing
was “grabbing at something that’s owed” her. Is it a better life Alma
wants—or just a leaner cut of rib eye?
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
November 8, 2015
Guards at the Taj
Audrey Skirball Kenis Theater at Geffen Playhouse
It cannot be said that Rajiv Joseph’s West Coast premiere Guards at the Taj is entertaining. Neither is it cheering, inspiring nor pleasantly distracting. But it thoroughly provokes thoughts and emotions like few other “entertainments” do.
Humayun (Raffi Barsoumian) and Babur (Ramiz Monsef) are two close friends from childhood, who joined the military and have been commissioned to stand guard at the Taj Mahal in 17th-century India. On this night, they and the edifice are at a climactic point. Construction of this legendary tomb, commissioned by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan, took 16 years, reportedly employing 20,000 men.
These two men stand guard through the night. At dawn the Taj will at last open to the public—or at least those who are allowed to look upon it. Humayun and Babur must keep their backs to it during their sentry duty, for gazing at such beauty is not meant for their social class. And yet they believe they are privileged for being given this task at this time.
Then what? What is to happen to the 20,000 laborers who know how to create such beauty? The emperor, corrupted by absolute power, devises a means of ensuring they will not be able to create again. The two guards, having done their guarding job so well, are given the task of dealing with those 20,000 souls. And it’s a supremely grisly task.
It would also be impossible to accomplish this in one night in real life. Obviously, Joseph has written a parable, potently asking how far each of us would go while we say, “I was only following orders.”
And yet the lifelong friendship between the two guards feels completely real. Humayun is a stickler, desperate to please his unpleasable father. Babur is a daring dreamer, a visionary, who relishes the pleasures life can offer. Humayun cautions Babur, Babur emboldens Humayun. Theirs seems an unbreakable friendship.
This play is also about power. The emperor commands, merely because he’s the emperor. But there are various levels of obedience to such commandments. Truth-telling, interpretation, turning a blind eye, self-sacrifice for a greater good—don’t we ultimately have power over our own actions?
Under Giovanna Sardelli’s thorough direction, the play begins with humor. Flickers of an eye, then bits of commedia, get the audience giggling. By the second scene of this 105-minute intermissionless session, Barsoumian and Monsef are close to Three Stooges territory. But by the play’s end, audiences may find themselves wondering if we’ll ever laugh again.
Sardelli’s vision is enhanced by Tom Buderwitz’s scenic design, which is crisply symmetrical and somewhat sterile until it bursts with a colorfully remembered life. The set is also finely engineered, including a drain for the gallons of blood. Yes, the emperor meant what he said.
Though it seems disappointing that the actors cast are not Indian, the men involved with the project were reportedly from neighboring nations. And, two of the finest actors of any heritage perform here, giving sophisticated, detailed, and ultimately crushing portrayals of two ordinary men in extraordinary but not unheard-of circumstances.
For the thoughtful theatergoer, who expects to be challenged, this is a must-experience time at the theater.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
October 15, 2015
Republished with kind permission of Daily News.
The Musical Comedy Murders of 1940
Theatre West
Playwright
John Bishop, a longtime member of New York’s Circle Repertory Theatre,
wrote a number of plays and screenplays, among them this comic spoof of
manor house murder mysteries. It follows in the tradition of screwball
comedies popular in the 1930s and ’40s.
The setting is the country house of Elsa Von Grossenknueten (Jacque
Lynn Colton), whose maid, Helsa (Michelle Holmes), is killed in the
first scene by the Stage Door Slasher and stashed in a closet. Elsa is a
wealthy backer of theatrical productions, and a group has gathered for
an audition, hoping she will support them in their newest endeavor. A
previous production had fallen victim to the Slasher’s murder of three
chorus girls, thus setting up the events to come.
First the actors appear: Patrick O’Reilly (Joe Nassi), Nikki Crandall
(Emily Rose McLeod), and Eddie McCuen (Patrick T. Rogers). They are
soon joined by a creative team, Roger Hopewell (Donald Moore) and
Bernice Roth (Anne Leyden), and the director, Ken de la Maize (Scott
Seiffert). Rounding out the ensemble are Michael Kelly (Kevin
Yarbrough), an undercover cop masquerading as Elsa’s employee, and
Marjorie Baverstock (Jeanine Anderson), a Broadway producer. With an
improbable plot and convoluted character deceptions, the events play out
for laughs and provide the actors with many opportunities for
outrageous exaggeration.
The set design, credited to “Pettifogger,” is a marvel of secret
panels and passageways that enhance the Slasher’s ability to exit and
enter during convenient power failures from a raging snowstorm that
prevents the occupants from leaving. The second victim is Baverstock,
who sits mutely through a run-through, even though a long sword
protrudes from the back of her chair.
Bishop’s penchant for farfetched
plot permutations allows for some of the best moments in the play. The
murdered Helsa suddenly reappears mysteriously. Why is the Slasher
intent on killing theatrical performers? What has prompted O’Reilly’s
violent altercation with the maid? And who really are all these people?
Leyden is a standout as a cross between Bette Davis and Tallulah
Bankhead, alternately screaming, drinking, and emoting as events play
out. Another marvelously campy performance is delivered by Seiffert as
the name-dropping artistic chief who tries to keep the production on
task as his crew spirals out of control. His eventual meltdown is sheer
lunacy.
McLeod and Rogers are pleasant as their mutual attraction develops,
Nassi is effectively sinister, and Moore’s evolution as the fey artiste
is amusing. Colton makes a perfectly dotty hostess, and Holmes is
accomplished as she carries out several characterizations.
Director Michael Van Duzer has a deft touch, much needed in this
rapid-fire, implausible comedy. The ensemble works well together,
obviously enjoying the farcical elements they are charged to carry out.
Emily Brown Kucera’s costumes are noteworthy and add the requisite
theatrical atmosphere. Yancey Dunham’s lighting and Austin Quan’s sound
effects also ramp up the mysterious effects needed to carry out the plot
devices.
There are no universal truths
revealed in this play. It is comedy, plain and simple, giving the
audience a chance to sit back and enjoy tomfoolery for a couple of
hours. It is a pleasant interlude.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
October 11, 2015
ICU
Circle X Theatre Co at Atwater Village Theatre
The
hospitalization and possible impending death of drug- and
alcohol-addicted Brian Seigenfeld (Tony DeCarlo) marks the amassing of
his tribe in the waiting room of a dingy New York City emergency room.
Presented environmentally, with the audience seated on chairs placed
along the walls of Atwater Village Theater’s appropriately sterile
office space, this darkly outrageous comedy by Fielding Edlow eradicates
any theory that, because so many majorly abnormal families have been
presented on the American stage, there are no fresh new twists to the
horror. Well, boo! Edlow’s ghastly Seigenfeld family is truly scary.
Gathered for the emotional vigil are Brian’s caustic mother, Ruth
(Caroline Aaron); inveterate joker and her secretly estranged husband,
Siggy (Joe Pachero); and their terminally neurotic daughter, Jenna
(Dagney Kerr). It’s not a nice quiet family reunion, as evidenced by
duty nurse Kate McGregor (Ericka Kreutz), who, despite her repeated
threats to call the police to get the family extracted from the
premises, almost gives them admiring points for being the loudest and
most disruptive family St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital has ever hosted.
Aaron’s nagging, entitled Ruth, a monstrously big presence who would
make Mama Rose look like Mother Teresa, is ready to control the ER as
completely as she has every other situation in her Housewives of New York City-esque
lifestyle. No matter how worried she is about her beloved comatose son
Brian struggling for air in the next room, she cannot abandon her need
to control, to make sure Siggy has eaten, if only from the vending
machine in the lobby, or that the 40-plus unmarried Jenna finally finds a
mate.
After trying to entice their son’s young doctor Gelber (Shaun
Anthony) with the attributes of her eye-rolling, sarcastic, one-line
spouting daughter, the next victim of her plotting is fellow
waiting-room denizen Kevyn (Doug Sutherland) who, it turns out after
much prodding from Ruth and Jenna, is also there to see Brian—and make
amends for something he will not share with the family despite their
lynch-mob mentality that would seemingly work to extract information
from a house plant.
In one of those cases of apples not falling far from the tree, the
obviously miserable, incredibly defensive Jenna could make any of the
Kardashian sisters look like Malala Yousafzai. Jenna notes the only
thing she and her mother have in common is liking Bill Maher and
almonds. Despite being quietly supported by her well-off father, she
still holds a grudge that they all but destroyed her dream of becoming a
standup comic (“You could be the Sarah Silverman of Dubuque!” Kevyn
observes).
Edlow’s characters are all rich
and well-crafted, although by the late return to consciousness of Brian,
one begins to wish maybe Nurse Kate had called the cops on the
Seigenfelds after all. There’s a rather unsatisfying end and resolution
to the story of this night at the ICU. But, considering how hilariously
skewed Edlow’s humor is and how able this particular cast is, under the
snappish direction of Brian Shnipper, to find something endearing about
these outlandishly exasperating people, everyone gets to leave with
bandages in all the right places.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
October 10, 2015
Man Covets Bird
24th Street Theatre
How
refreshing to witness a show suitable for all ages that neither talks
down to its older attendees nor leaves its youngest audience members in
the dust. This US premiere—only its second production worldwide—has
something for everyone. Playwright Finegan Kruckemeyer’s engaging tale
of a young man who develops a touching relationship with a wild bird
captures both the heart and mind. In the hands of director Debbie Devine
and a phenomenally talented two-person cast, the result is magically
inspirational.
Andrew Huber masterfully tells the tale, in third person, of our
young hero. While executing all necessary actions required for carrying
out his role, he offers a performance of such charming gentility that
one can’t help but be drawn in to his character’s storyline. This young
man, whose name is never specified, marches to the beat of his own
Bohemian drum, so much so that when he is confronted by a young bird, it
seems only natural that the two would strike up a nearly lifelong
relationship. Along the way, Huber’s remarkable handling of
Kruckemeyer’s 70-minute, intermissionless monologue produces an
engaging, edge-of-your-seat effect.
Likewise, Leeav Sofer’s contribution, though never through the spoken
word, is absolutely essential to the show’s message. As the undefined
bird, his characterization is that of an ever-present, undemanding
soulmate to the man. And despite the occasional well-placed birdcall,
Sofer’s performance never falls prey to that of caricature. Instead, we
are treated to gorgeously crafted original melodies— written by Sofer
and self-accompanied on keyboard and clarinet—that he performs with
Huber, who plays acoustic guitar. These interludes, best described as in
folk style, are spine-tingling in their harmonic beauty as they set
Kruckemeyer’s lyrics to music.
Devine’s work in crafting this
production is aided by some of the finest production values imaginable.
In this venue’s warehouse-like surroundings—it was once a
turn-of-the-century carriage house—and utilizing nothing more than a
rolling A-frame ladder and small “beat-box” cubes as portable furniture,
her cast moves effortlessly around the thrust stage and through the
seating areas. Surrounding the perimeter of the playing space are four
distinct areas upon which simplistically hand-drawn projected animation
creates various locales. These videos, credited to Matthew G. Hill and
Sara Haddadin, flow from one screen to the next while perfectly timed to
the actors’ actions.
Cricket S Myers’s sound cues are a rich addition, in at least one
instance seamlessly continuing Sofer’s clarinet solo. Dan Weingarten’s
lighting is specific when necessary and lush when appropriate. And a big
“hats off” to stage manager Alexx Zachary for calling a show that most
certainly must consist of hundreds of cues.
Kruckemeyer’s script asks, what effect does every moment of our lives
have on those we encounter. To the credit of this company’s motto,
“Theater for all audiences,” it is more than obvious this goal had been
met and then some.
Reviewed by Dink O’Neal
October 6, 2015
Breathing Room
Greenway Court Theatre
Greenway Court Theatre’s Breathing Room
is a 70-minute metaphysical self-help session, scored to electric
violin and synthesizer and incorporating quantum theory. It insists that
people are debilitated by overwhelming technological change, and it
recommends an extended time-out to develop a fresh perspective on the
natural world. With so many theater artists trafficking in campiness,
cynicism, and cheap sentiment, it’s refreshing when a show comes
along—24th Street Theatre’s Walking the Tightrope was another—determined to make one feel better merely through delicate imagery and leaps of the imagination.
As teased out in the program, Mary Lou Newmark is an electronic
composer and performer who was discovering convergences among her
personal agitation with modern life, musings on contemporary anomie, and
musical interests.
She created a semi-avatar “Marilyn,” described as “a visual artist
who was creative but somewhat trapped inside her standards and a little
overwhelmed with life,” in tandem with “The Professor,” a mischievous
trickster/Yoda type holding the keys to psychic secrets. Their
performance art vignettes are now stitched together by director Dan
Berkowitz, and though the stitches are showing, a through-line ends up
coming across.
Eileen T’Kaye’s Marilyn is fussy
and flustered—she maintains a running set of annoyed exhalations, not
the most enjoyable or active of character traits—as well as sincere and
grounded in her effort to keep it together while expanding her mental
horizons.
Charles Reese possesses the combined sweetness and gravitas I
associate with the late, great Scatman Crothers. If he overdoes the twee
“Magic to Do” invitational affect at times, he brings clarity and
excitement to the merging of arcane concepts like quantum wave function
(QWF) to trips to a retail store or interactions with forest creatures.
The actors make for an engaging New Age vaudeville team, presenting
their anecdotal concerns and exploring possible remedies. All the while,
Newmark is half-seen behind a leafy scrim stage right, offering musical
accompaniment now playfully soaring, now scorching like a cello.
I found myself wishing that
Newmark had given something for Marilyn to be really pissed off about,
so that her spiritual quest could have some guts. I also yearned for The
Professor to make some discoveries, not just reveal them with puckish
delight.
But then I reminded myself that character conflict and growth are the
domain of traditional drama. They’re simply inappropriate to the
performance art genre and, particularly, to the kind of balletic chalk
talk Berkowitz and Newmark have built.
When I just gave myself over to the melodies and images and let the
concepts wash over me, I actually experienced a slight (if not quantum)
sensory shift. Perhaps there’s something to this idea of watching an
osprey pounce from his point of view, instead of that of oneself or of
the prey. Maybe popping the QWF—pronounced “quaff,” a buzzword Newmark
purveys heavily here—isn’t such a bad idea.
It’s not inconceivable that you too will feel like a better, or more whole, or just more aware, person at the end of Breathing Room.
Probably more so than me, even. Still, the entire event is an emphatic
reaction against splashy vulgarity, so those inclined to the campy,
cynical, or sentimental might prefer to seek their healing elsewhere.
On the other hand, they might do best to hurry over to the Greenway
Court without delay. Succor is in such short supply these days.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
October 5, 2015
Awake and Sing!
Odyssey Theatre
When Awake and Sing!
was produced in 1935, it was a transformative experience for
theatergoers. Playwright Clifford Odets was an early member of the Group
Theatre in New York, a lab for Stanislavski’s system of acting with a
shared commitment among the collective for social change through
theater. Among the most prominent members were Sanford Meisner, Stella
Adler, Lee Strasberg, and Elia Kazan.
The youthful Odets wrote Waiting for Lefty, acclaimed for its call for progressive remedies for workers, including unionization. Its success led to Awake and Sing! in 1935, less fiery but still espousing reform for economic injustice in the aftermath of the Depression.
In Awake and Sing!,
the modest Bronx apartment of the Jewish Berger family is the setting
for the unfolding story of the sometimes contentious clan. Bessie
(Marilyn Fox); her father, Jacob (Allan Miller); her ineffectual but
optimistic husband, Myron (Robert Lesser); Bessie and Myron’s edgy grown
daughter, Hennie (Melissa Paladino); and their 22-year-old son, Ralph
(James Morosini), co-exist in the small but well-kept lodging (nicely
articulated living space by Pete Hickok).
In the mix are Bessie’s affluent brother, Morty (Richard Fancy), and
Moe Axelrod (David Agranov), a cynical family friend whose pugnacious
and brash manner adds spice to the dialogue and underscores a simmering
tension between Hennie and him. It has just been learned that Hennie is
pregnant. To satisfy Bessie’s desires for respectability, she wields her
considerable influence and forces Hennie to marry Sam (Gary Patent), a
Russian man she doesn’t love who is courting her.
Odets chose an often utilized
three-act format, and once the scene is set, the second act a year later
contains the dolorous elements of the story. Ralph falls in love, but
Bessie is contemptuous of the penniless orphan girl he has chosen.
Jacob, in spite of being bullied by his daughter, encourages Ralph to
break free and find a fulfilling life. He counsels, “Awake and sing, ye
that dwell in the dust, and the earth shall cast out the dead.” For a
brief time, Odets was a member of the Communist Party, and some of
Jacob’s Marxist imprecations are left-leaning and express a strong
social conscience.
Fox’s austere characterization reflects bitter disappointment in her
marriage and a seeming disregard for the happiness of any of her family
members. She seems a slightly darker character than Odets envisioned,
and the only affection she shows is for her brother, but it is obvious
in her manner that his wealth is the contributing factor. Fancy is
spot-on as the self-satisfied and arrogant merchant, touting his
superiority over the group and clashing with Jacob over political
ideology. Miller is appealing as the gentle and frustrated idealist.
Odets envisioned the play with comedic touches, somewhat lost in this
grim portrayal of dreams and romance lost. Agranov comes closest to
capturing lighter moments as he snipes away at the family. Paladino
delivers a despondent Hennie, but some of her spunk returns as she and
Moe decide to abandon convention and leave to seek happiness.
The ensemble is well-cast and directed by Elina de Santos, reprising
an earlier production she helmed 20 years ago at the Odyssey. Notable in
this cast are Patent, who manages to wring all the anguish out of his
hopeless marriage, and Morosini, whose youth is seemingly crushed by
circumstance. He makes the transition from helplessness to optimism
believable. Lesser makes a sympathetic foil for Fox’s harsh iron will.
The ensemble creates a cohesive whole and delivers skilled
characterizations.
Costumes by Kim DeShazo are effective, and Leigh Allen’s lighting
design sets the appropriate mood. Sound designer Christopher Moscatiello
achieves a 1930s flavor with Caruso recordings and radio broadcasts.
Odets’s choice to conclude the
events with an illusory happy ending for all is probably less realistic
than the exposition suggests, but it ties up all the ends satisfactorily
for the audience. At least Ralph finds strength within himself and hope
for the future.
A revival of Odets’s play seems fitting as some of the same
uncertainties exist in today’s political and economic climate. The
dialogue is certainly dated and solutions to their problems would be
handled much differently today, but as a glimpse into America’s
theatrical past, it is thought-provoking.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
September 28, 2015
The Princes of Kings Road
Ensemble Studio Theatre/LA at Neutra Institute and Museum of Silverlake
In
the first site-specific production from EST/LA, performed in
Silverlake’s Neutra Institute Museum and Gallery—designed in 1950 by
Richard Neutra along with his son Dion, who here co-produces—Tom
Lazarus’s play, developed in EST/LA’s Playwright Unit workshop, offers a
fascinating look at our metropolis’ greatest architect and the
contentious relationship he shared with his onetime mentor, business
partner, and later bitter adversary Rudolph Schindler.
After 23 years of personal and professional disaffection, estranged
groundbreaking modernist designers Neutra and Schindler (Raymond Xifo
and John Nielsen) find themselves suddenly forced back together again,
serendipitously assigned to adjoining beds at Cedars of Lebanon
Hospital. Although the details of their reunion are here only
fictionalized, one might hope this is something like how it really went
down, beginning with the former colleagues and family-like
friends—Schindler sponsored Neutra to come to the United States from
their native Austria, where they’d met as students at Vienna’s Technical
College—shouting to their poor beleaguered duty nurse (Heather
Robinson) that one of them has to immediately be moved to another room.
As the insults (“Sycophant!” screams Schindler; “Narcissist!” yells
Neutra) slowly begin to die down, one major thing Lazarus has captured
is the pair’s enormous respect for each other’s work and talent. The
vitriol between them tames down as they start to reminisce about the
days when they designed together, Schindler as the world-class futurist
he was, Neutra as the genius engineer who could make his partner’s
otherworldly plans functional. “We were bolder, simpler than anyone,”
Schindler laments, “and architects today imitate our designs!”
With the inclusion of simple
staging by Lazarus on a stationary set consisting mainly of two hospital
beds, the never-before explored personal relationship shared by these
two great men, whose cultural legacy changed not only the landscape of
Southern California but influenced all of mid-century design across the
globe, is a fascinating journey. Schindler had opened his famous Kings
Road home to Neutra and his family when he arrived in LA in 1925 after
working for two years in Chicago under Frank Lloyd Wright (whom
Schindler refers to here as more a publicist than an architect). But
Schindler is resentful over a major contract he believed his friend
stole from him all those years before.
Still, as the men’s forced time together continues and as Schindler’s
cancer makes him increasingly frail, their former love for each other
resurfaces. As played by Xifo and Nielsen, these illustrious men’s
individual virtuosity, as well as their flawed and fragile humanity,
emerge. Xifo is especially impressive, able to effortlessly overcome
Lazarus’s flowery and often overwritten speeches. Nielsen’s humorous
take on Schindler’s former Bacchanalian lifestyle is a perfect foil for
Neutra. Robinson also handles her rather underwritten role as the ping
pong ball literally bouncing between the men’s fiercely played game but
without much of a substantial character arc of her own.
The writing could be less theatrical and more real, but Lazarus’s
play should have a life well beyond this first mounting, albeit with
pruning of the characters’ sometimes stilted dialogue. It is also a
tremendous treat to see it performed where it is, in this austerely
angled, authentically Neutra-envisioned space featuring the designer’s
original exposed strip neon lighting and signature louvered windows.
Driving home from the opening
weekend matinee along the winding Silverlake reservoir, with its many
Neutra houses looming along the east side of the boulevard reflecting
the sunset in their majestic walls of windows (which Neutra tells us in
the play was his intention), all directly facing Schindler’s magnificent
sprawling flying saucer of a house peeking through the overgrown
foliage at the tippy-top of the hill on the other shore of the lake, one
might have a new respect for the accomplishments of two of Los
Angeles’s most-enduring 20th-century visionaries.
“We were reinventing the world, Rudolph,” Neutra proclaims to his
unlikely roommate. “We were re-creating our Vienna!” And, in the
process, they were also reinventing Los Angeles and solidifying its
position as one of the major design capitals of the world.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
September 20, 2015
One Slight Hitch
Torrance Theatre Company
Lewis
Black is the standup comedian who delivers prodding rants punctuated by
his crooked and wriggling index fingers. He’s rather genius, assuming
one agrees with his views.
He has written handfuls of plays, too, and his One Slight Hitch
is in production at Torrance Theatre Company through Oct. 11. “If my
name weren’t on it, nobody would know that I wrote this play,” he is
quoted as saying.
But not for the reasons he seems to be implying. He’s a bright man,
he reportedly fell in love with theater at age 12, he holds an MFA from
Yale School of Drama. One couldn’t prove any of this by his play.
It takes place in 1981 on the wedding day of Courtney Coleman (Kay
Capasso). She’s scheduled to marry Harper, her straitlaced boyfriend of
only a short while. But somehow she and her parents keep referring to
Harper as Ryan.
We learn some of this, and more,
from Courtney’s sister, P.B. (Makenzie Browning), who narrates via
voiceover because she’s looking back on this day from the present and
because her 16-year-old, onstage self is made oblivious by massive
headphones that blast the hits of 1981. Courtney’s other sister, Melanie
(Collette Rutherford), ought to be made oblivious by the massive amount
of booze she drinks.
As Courtney’s family gets ready for the wedding, cracks appear in the
nuptial joy. Driving the dramaturgical wedge into that joy is the
unexpected arrival of Ryan (Johan Badh), Courtney’s recently dumped
boyfriend.
Ryan wants to be the Jack Kerouac of the 1980s, including all that
entails. He’s the antithesis of the steady Harper (Ryan Shapiro), who,
once he’s clued in on the hitch, takes the lunacy with noble good
nature.
It’s pretty standard farcical
fare, as Ryan gets shoved out of the way into either the living-room
closet or the puzzlingly right-off-the-living-room shower—this odd
architecture a fault of the script, not of the direction.
But director Glenn Kelman’s casting may have contributed to one of
the most troubling misfires here. David McGee and Shirley Hatton play
Dr. and Mrs. Coleman, Courtney’s parents. Whatever the political
leanings of these fine actors may be, onstage here they don’t look like
the Reaganites of the script. In a play like this, the audience judges
characters by their looks, and these two look like hippies. It doesn’t
help that McGee’s Doc wanders around the house in an unbuttoned
short-sleeved shirt, his undershirt on proud display.
Harper’s parents show up at the house, but Black keeps them out of
sight, and McGee’s aptitude for comedy shines in Doc’s monologue
delivered out the front door as he unhospitably struggles to prevent the
travelers from entering or otherwise discovering the goings-on inside.
Rutherford, a highly skilled
actor, must have wrestled mightily with her underwritten character, a
nurse who cares deeply about healing, yet who drinks astonishing
quantities of liquor after an all-nighter and on the morning of her
sister’s wedding. Does Melanie love Courtney? Does she lust after Ryan
or does she want Ryan to marry Courtney? Can Melanie walk into the
backyard on this summer afternoon, wearing a satin full-length
bridesmaid’s dress and all that big hair, and not be toppling over from
inebriation?
Rutherford is also saddled with a nurse’s outfit that’s too short and
too tight, apparently scripted thusly. But the highlight of Diana
Mann’s costuming may be Ryan’s “Star Wars” boxers, which, for those who
live in either hope or fear when Ryan emerges from the shower, wrapped
in a towel, get revealed by the teasing Melanie.
Black hints early on about the play’s denouement. “Can I have a real
life and still write?” Courtney muses. “Courtney will have the wedding
that we never had,” her mother notes. In between, his dialogue takes
ungainly turns to move the plot, but at least the plot suits the
characters and their personal histories.
And at least here, Kelman and the
cast approach this production with such commitment and conviviality that
it’s hard to totally dislike the play. One other aspect draws our
admiration. Mrs. Coleman has enough self-awareness to know why she wants
this wedding so desperately: Her generation was shredded by war, and
now wants to see her children’s oblivious generation come back to life.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
September 14, 2015
Mojada: A Medea in Los Angeles
The Theatre @ Boston Court at the Barbara and Lawrence Fleischman Theater at the Getty Villa
Each
year for the past 10 years, the Getty Villa in Pacific Palisades has
commissioned a Los Angeles theater company to adapt an Ancient Greek
play for the Getty’s outdoor amphitheater. This year, the Pasadena-based
Theatre @ Boston Court sets the Euripides tragedy Medea in modern-day Boyle Heights, to create Mojada: A Medea in Los Angeles, and the results are spellbinding.
Playwright Luis Alfaro hews to the original’s plot—the story of a
woman with supernatural abilities who helps her beloved Jason “get
ahead” and then is utterly betrayed by him. But Alfaro’s adaptation
feels fresh and unforced.
Under Jessica Kubzansky’s superbly clear but subtle direction, the
play begins with a Greek feel, set against the Getty Museum’s classical
façade, as Medea’s servant Tita begins the tale. Soon, a small two-story
white brick-and-clapboard house rolls onstage, and we are indisputably
in the barrio. Designed by Efren Delgadillo Jr., the house’s front wall
is created with semi-transparent fabric, so the audience can see inside
when lighting designer Ben Zamora wants us to.
Tita (the mononymous Vivis) is our Greek chorus. As she recounts this
tale in a style that ranges from spiritualism to standup, it’s apparent
she adores Medea, but she also hints at reasons for Medea’s behavior,
and these reasons take the story from myth to modern life.
Medea never stops feeling like a mojada,
Mexican slang for wetback. She and her family came here illegally, Tita
tells us via a flashback, just as other border crossings fill today’s
news. The borders in this tale, however, may wander into mental health
territory, also ripped from horrifying headlines.
Crafted by Alfaro and Kubzansky,
this Medea is of another world, and, in portraying her, Sabina Zuniga
Varela lives as if in a dream she can’t awaken from. Varela’s Medea
could be a soul of the past, she could be unrelentingly clinging to her
life as it was in Mexico. She is also very likely unhinged.
In contrast, the Hason of Justin Huen is perfectly ordinary. Not to
say Huen’s acting is. He’s a veteran of Alfaro’s other Los Angeles
adaptations of the classics: Electricidad (Alfaro’s reworking of the Electra myth) and Oedipus El Rey (his updating of Oedipus Rex).
But Huen makes Hason such a convincingly oblivious jerk that Hason’s
excuse to Medea, “It’s not what you think,” is as much a machete to our
hearts as, well, no spoilers here.
Alfaro may have helped ground the story for modern audiences by
making Tita an unreliable narrator. She, too, is a sorceress, and not
one convincingly fond of the audience. She begins with an invocation to
ancient spirits, ends as she clears the stage, but in between repeatedly
uses her playfully insincere smile for pointed humor.
Greek plays need a messenger. Here that role is filled by Josefina, a
cheery gossip, played by the earthy, exuberant Zilah Mendoza. Josefina
warns Medea about Hason’s boss, Armida.
Medea’s flights of spirituality let Armida know that the competition
is easily assailable, as we watch the thoughts of both actors spin. As
played by Marlene Forte, Armida is a powerful force who casts a
different sort of spell on Hason—rooted in money and lust.
Only one element might momentarily
distract the audience from this mesmerizing evening. It’s the acting of
young Anthony Gonzalez, playing the 10-year-old son, Acan. Gonzalez is
astonishingly skilled, and we may step back to marvel at him. In him, we
vividly “see” the parched, exhausted travelers along their border
crossing. Though standing on the stage, he seems to sweat in the crowded
truck, he seems to want so much to sleep lying down. And yet Gonzalez
finds joy in the humorous moments of the play. None of this is faked.
This actor’s imagination is living in these circumstances.
Alfaro includes much Mexican slang and other in-jokes about Los
Angeles. But the context and subtle translations make the dialogue
pleasantly understandable.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
September 11, 2015
Broadway Bound
Theatre Palisades at Pierson Playhouse
Theatergoers
are rarely able to observe characters growing up over the course of
several plays. Shakespeare’s Prince Hal provides one notable exception.
Playwright Neil Simon offers another. In his Brighton Beach Memoirs,
we met Eugene Jerome, the hilariously genial youngster in 1940s New
York, torn between becoming a professional baseball player and becoming a
famous writer.
Eugene is Simon’s stand-in, so at the end of Brighton Beach we know where Eugene is headed. Simon then takes Eugene through army basic training in Biloxi Blues, in which references to his talent for and obsession with writing promise another happy ending, at least for Eugene.
The third play about Eugene, Broadway Bound,
currently in a production by Theatre Palisades at Pierson Playhouse,
finds Eugene and his brother, Stanley, as a young adults in 1949, about
to break in to scriptwriting for radio and television, as did Simon and
his equally funny but less famous brother, Danny.
In the first play of the trilogy, Eugene’s parents, Kate and Jack
Jerome, are solidly married. Perhaps Eugene was too young to see the
cracks in the marriage, but here the very realistic, very heartrending
problems between Kate and Jack are centerstage.
So, too, are the travails facing the incipient writers, and these
provide the comedy. Eugene and Stanley have one night to churn out a
script or face never working again, and their agony gets empathetic
laughs.
For the most part, director Sherry
Coon doesn’t let the comedy get forced, nor does she let her actors
sink into self-pity. One hint about Coon’s take on the play may come
from set designer Sherman Wayne’s color scheme here. The wallpaper
pattern in the Jerome house is of green roses on a creamy background,
and the trim on the home’s exterior is green—the color symbolizing
growth, health and healing. Eugene and Stanley will be fine. So, too,
will Kate, who, suddenly facing an empty nest, seems to grow a
magnificently sturdy spine.
Portraying Eugene, DL Corrigan is rather impish. Eugene usually has a
gimlet-eyed take on the family’s foibles, but Corrigan’s Eugene has
more of a twinkle in his eye out of sheer enjoyment of his family.
Playing Kate, Georgan George is not quite the usual Jewish mother,
either. She also squints and scowls to a distracting degree. But her
ability to create a devoted mother and betrayed wife is outstanding.
David Tracq masters the energy and
enthusiasm of Stanley. Tracq impressively remains effervescent through
Stanley’s panicked night trying to write a comedy sketch, and his
excitement at listening to the Jerome brothers’ words on the radio is
fresh and truthful.
Dark clouds hang over Kenneth Steven Bernfield’s Jack. The model father in Brighton Beach Memoirs
lives in a grayer area here, and Bernfield delicately wrestles the
demons who prevent Jack from being the man his sons believed him to be.
Kate’s sister, Blanche, gets a memorable portrayal by Caroline
Westheimer, refusing to apologize for her new wealth, pleading
beautifully with her father to call his wife, because, yes, marital
relationships are not this family’s strongest skill.
But one other cause for heartbreak crept up on opening night. The
actor playing Kate’s über-Socialist father, Ben, was apparently a late
replacement and was shaky on his lines. By way of a crutch, he seemed to
be begging for laughs for his character. Most of this occurred at the
top of the play, setting a sour tone that gradually faded.
Simon, as it turns out, has not had the happiest of personal lives,
despite his phenomenal professional success. Eugene, one hopes, will
learn from his family’s, and Simon’s, mistakes and fare better.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
September 7, 2015
When Stars Align
Odyssey Theatre
When Stars Align
is a novel by Carole Eglash-Kosoff, chronicling conflicts between
advantaged whites and black slaves in the Civil War–era South. Now
adapted into a play (by the author, with co-writer and director John
Henry Davis) spanning many years, it blends history with the story of
young black Thaddeus (Jason Woods) and the daughter of a plantation
owner, Amy (Haley McHugh), who form a friendship in a time when to do so
would be death to Thaddeus. Beyond these pivotal characters are the
stories of the son of the house, Henry (Nick Ballard); his wife,
Elizabeth (Sarah Lyddan); and Henry’s father, Jedidiah (Veryle Rupp).
Adding to the running narrative is the tragedy of the slaves and
others integral to the changes occurring despite Southern opposition to
the politics of the day and the abolition movement. But, from the
archetypal mammy, Sarah (Tamiyka White), to assorted slaves who rail
against mistreatment, the characters waver into caricature, and the
story’s predictability is telegraphed from the play’s beginning. Having
said that, the cast is uniformly well-directed and strives to create
passionate portrayals.
The villain of the piece is Henry:
a vitriolic, bigoted, and thoroughly reprehensible character in the
hands of Eglash-Kosoff and Davis. Young Henry has raped a field slave,
Rose (Allison Reeves), leading to Thaddeus’s birth. Much to Henry’s
dismay, his father favors the boy, teaching him to read and employing
him as a house slave. Henry’s dissolute character is further
demonstrated by womanizing with prostitutes and a loveless marriage to
Elizabeth, whom he chooses only to sire his children.
Through many events of war and retribution, the story highlights the
actual Colfax massacre that took place in Louisiana in 1873. The play
portrays the slaughter of many of the black characters who have finally
found a semblance of freedom after the war. Historically interesting, it
might have been more effective as a greater plot focus in this episodic
production.
Ballard’s Henry is easy to hate, and he carries a lot of the show on
his shoulders. Woods is also notable as the young naive boy who must
cope with his personal history and ambitions. Lyddan plays a fragile
Southern belle whose tragic fate is played out against her feelings of
entitlement and white privilege.
McHugh is earnest as the rebellious daughter who loves unwisely, and
Rupp portrays a complex father. White, too, is good, straddling her role
as mediator.
JR Bruce’s utilitarian set works
well, establishing the plantation, cotton fields, a riverbank, and a
battlefield. Leigh Allen’s lighting is mood appropriate, and Michael
Mullen’s costumes lend verisimilitude to the period.
Adapting a play from a novel is tricky, especially one that traverses
time and place. Eglash-Kosoff has attempted to include much of her
novel’s plot. Some of the dramatic effect is lost in taking on too many
events, and multiple characterizations get lost in the telling. Fiddle
and guitar music at the beginning and post-intermission are
mood-setting, but they slow the momentum of the story. Kudos to the
cast, though, for heartfelt performances.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
September 6, 2015
Someone Who’ll Watch Over Me
Little Fish Theatre
Since
it premiered in 1992, this Frank McGuinness play hasn’t lost its
plausibility. It takes place in a windowless cell in Lebanon, where
three men of differing nationalities are held as hostages. Centering on
the psychological toll of being imprisoned, the play explores a timeless
yearning for, and fear of, being watched over. All these elements get
tender care in Little Fish Theatre’s production, as an Irishman,
American, and Englishman struggle to survive, physically and mentally,
while chained in place for months on end.
The strong, steady young American doctor, Adam (Doug Mattingly),
plays peacemaker between the Irish journalist, Edward (Joshua Thomas),
and the English professor of English language, Michael (Ben Hensley).
The script is not overtly political, though Irish playwright McGuinness
wouldn’t miss this chance to include nationalistic barbs in the
conversations.
To try to keep their sanity intact, the men “make” movies, re-create
famous moments in sports history and recite the correspondence they’d be
sending home if they could. Yes, the power of storytelling keeps them
going.
The play’s title is a takeoff on
the Gerswin song, which the script suggests be sung or piped in between
scenes—an apparently annoying stage direction that director Tito Ortiz
wisely decided to scrap in this production. Instead, Ortiz lets the
script and his lighting designer, Stacey Abrams, indicate the passage of
time and variations in state of mind.
To varying extents, the captives believe God watches over them, as
they read from the Bible and the Quran. The title also refers to the
guards, whom the three men seem to believe are observing them from
above. But the title also refers to the parents and spouses the men
think they failed to please, as well as to those who haunt the trio’s
memories.
Michael feels remorse for the death of his wife. But, referring to
himself as a “pansy little Englishman,” he visibly winces as the other
two continually promote their unflinching heterosexuality. Adam notes
his academic accomplishments, perhaps mostly to convince himself his
family must have been proud. And in a wrenching moment near the play’s
end, Edward begs to be driven in an imaginary car to his father’s grave
for one last bit of comforting.
Ortiz has the actors carry their
chains on and off the stage, perhaps symbolizing our responsibility for
our own actions—an idea Adam touches upon. The actors are so good, they
can carry the chains and the concept without distracting the audience,
keeping us very much involved in their characters’ despair and hope.
But keeping the actors chained, and usually seated or lying on the
cell’s floor, means audience members seated behind the front rows cannot
see all of the action without shifting in their seats.
Equally as distracting, the script gets repetitive and bloated,
particularly in Act 2. During a long passage that tries but fails to be
Beckett’s Waiting for Godot.
Michael and Edward ponder Adam’s whereabouts by repeating that he is
dead, until the audience either doubts it or begins not to care.
McGuinness also packs the script with large portions of “Amazing
Grace,” “Run Rabbit Run,” and George Herbert’s poem “Love.” The
recitations are not without their import to the men, but a line or two
from each would suffice.
The filth-encrusted men fantasize
about cocktails and swapping Christmas presents. For his gift, Michael
wants only a washcloth. He makes the audience think of the many men and
women who are trying to live through similar circumstances. We, the
lucky ones, watch our brethren find ways to survive. Then we can head
home, hug our loved ones, and wash our faces.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
August 17, 2015
Republished with kind permission of Daily Breeze.
Much Ado About Nothing
Independent Shakespeare Company at Griffith Park
As
a welcomed evening breeze ushered out the reticent vestiges of a
traditionally warm Southern California summer’s day, director Jeffrey
Wienckowski and his merry band transported all in attendance to a flower
festooned villa on the Island of Sicily. Under a starlit sky,
Shakespeare’s famous treatise on love—be it eagerly adopted or equally
as scorned—played out with an enjoyably raucous abandon. Transposed to
the summer of 1945 and the waning days of World War II, Wienckowski’s
version suffers not a whit of the oft-glaring directorial
conceptualizations sometimes foisted upon the Bard’s works. In other
words, we buy it, and what a treat we’ve purchased.
Leading this troupe are David Melville and Melissa Chalsma, real-life
husband and wife co-founders of Independent Shakespeare Company, as the
tepid-turned-torrid lovers Benedick and Beatrice. Unlike that of
Shakespeare’s Kate and Petruchio, this love-hate relationship is one
rooted solely in the cerebral rather than the physical. Much to the
delight of the opening-night viewers, Melville and Chalsma fairly
reveled in their characters’ verbal swordplay. Likewise, each offers
standout solo moments, including downright silly romps throughout the
seating areas. In fact, so engaging was Melville, disguised at one point
as an ice cream vendor, that a number of younger audience members
stopped the show as they approached his pushcart in the hopes of
procuring a frozen delight.
Another scene stealer of the first
rank is André Martin as the malaprop-spouting Master Constable
Dogberry. By way of introduction, Martin, along with Thomas Ehas as his
right-hand man, Officer Verges, made their way through the crowd during
intermission distributing “citations.” As Act Two progressed, Martin’s
bumbling shenanigans, more than a little reminiscent of John Cleese,
were the perfectly orchestrated counterpart to the dark subplot in which
the secondary love interests, Claudio and Hero, played quite nicely by
Erwin Tuazon and Danny Brown, find themselves.
Strong supporting turns are offered here by Danny Campbell as Hero’s
father/Beatrice’s uncle, Leonato, in whose villa the play is set, and
Napoleon Tavale as Don Pedro, the commander of the respite-seeking
battalion. The antagonist of the piece, if there be one, is the
black-hearted Don John, illegitimate brother to Don Pedro. Rendered with
lip-smacking glee by William Elsman and backed by Richard Azurdia and
Xavi Moreno as his stoogish henchmen, this trio brings a surprisingly
successful sense of the melodramatic to the proceedings.
Director Wienckowski’s efforts are
further bolstered by mighty fine production values. Amanda Lee’s
costuming, in a wide range of nationalities and eras, proffers a
theatrical flair. In particular, her soldiers’ ensembles run the gamut
from the traditional dark blue with red piping to Melville’s strikingly
handsome Canadian Mounties–inspired uniform. Sound designer Chris
Porter’s recorded radio news updates and original musical compositions
add a pleasant touch to this highly approachable rendition of one of
Shakespeare’s more audience-friendly texts.
Reviewed by Dink O’Neal
August 12, 2015
Citizen: An American Lyric
Fountain Theatre
James
Baldwin once noted that skin color cannot be as important as being a
human being, something that Stephen Sachs and his Fountain Theatre
family have explored time and again over their impressive trailblazing
25-year tenure in our city. Once again, Sachs and his intrepid cohorts
have proven themselves to be a vital, urgently significant voice in the
battle for our humanity with Sachs’s provocative new adaptation of
Claudia Rankine’s international bestselling book of confrontational
poetry, here customized into a startlingly creative and highly
theatrical meditation on the inequities of race relations in America.
Rankine’s mismatch of personal stories dealing with racism, told
directly to the audience in arrestingly lyrical yet in-your-face verse,
confronts how African-Americans are treated in our troubled society, and
it could not have surfaced more timely. From beyond how our president
is treated and disparaged because of his color or the daily stinging
news reports of the deadly way people in authority treat minorities,
Rankine confronts an audience peppered with non-minorities with
disturbing tales of horrific abuse interspersed with simple verbal faux
pas slipping from the lips of people trying to show others just how
liberal they are—like someone at a party who, trying to form a
well-meaning but ill-advised connection, instead carves a crevice as
deep as the Grand Canyon by cheerfully telling someone she has features
more like a white person.
“Being around a black person,” one
of Rankine’s characters observes, “is sometimes like watching a foreign
film without translation,” while another cannot get it out of her head
when someone close to her keeps calling her by the name of her
housekeeper. Also explored is the career of Serena Williams, who seemed
to have to fight through a separate set of rules and a slew of possibly
racist judges to get the recognition she deserves, not to mention
learning how to keep her tongue and push ahead without angry outbursts.
Under the dynamic direction of Shirley Jo Finney and with a special
nod to the precision movement work created by Anastasia Coon, this
stellar cast of six—Bernard K. Addison, Leith Burke, Tina Lifford, Tony
Maggio, Simone Missick, and Lisa Pescia—could not have been more
perfectly chosen to deliver the punch of Rankine’s thought-provoking
spoken-word collage. Utilizing as a mantra a quote from Zora Neale
Hurston, “I feel most colored when I am thrown against a sharp white
background,” Finney’s uber-committed sextet weaves around one another,
making way for one another verbally and physically, recounting instance
after instance of the many imbalances in our social interactions.
The results are disquieting in
many ways, and surely that, in part, is Rankine’s intention. Her
brilliantly dramatic urban prose leaves us to contemplate our own deeply
imbedded and often hidden prejudices, certainly something to revisit
often in our lives and dealings with others. Still, Citizen: An American Lyric
could sporadically soften its stance a tad or maybe even occasionally
detail a few of our species’ strides and similarities as well as our
differences. Part of what is most unsettling is that it confronts us so
relentlessly, yet never even momentarily offers any resolution. The
often irate indictments spewed out makes those gathered feel somewhat
more attacked and personally accused rather than encouraging us to join
together to make changes happen, to possibly suggest ways we can all
work together to improve our lot in life. As Rankine observes, “just
getting along should not be an ambition.”
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
August 9, 2015
Bent
Mark Taper Forum
The
brightest hope for Center Theatre Group’s revival of Martin Sherman’s
controversial 1979 play at the Taper, aside from the bells and whistles
available to designers and theater artists in that revered space, was
the choice of Moisés Kaufman as director. Kaufman’s brilliance at taking
challenging raw material and turning it into gold is well-established,
based on the limitless originality of his 33 Variations, The Laramie Project, and Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde. And truly, this restoration is visually stunning, just as expected.
Beowulf Boritt’s austerely unadorned but startlingly versatile set is
surely a stunner, exquisitely complemented by his costuming, Justin
Townsend’s stark lighting, and sound designer Cricket S Myers’s
ever-present ambient sound, which begins as white noise but by the end
intentionally crescendos into something from which—like this play—one
wishes to find relief. Kaufman’s ensemble is also made up of exceptional
performers who work diligently to find the moments in Sherman’s
difficult and often annoyingly predictable script. The final tableaux,
which features the entire cast turned silently upstage contemplating a
hugely emotive stage-to-rafters wall of photos of people lost in the
Holocaust, is a quintessentially Kaufman touch.
The problem with Bent
is that, no matter how much talent and inventiveness goes into
re-creating it, the script is clunky and terribly flawed. When it
debuted 36 years ago, its central theme, the treatment of and
incarceration of gays in Hitler’s Germany, was a draw. It premiered back
in the day when one of the most joked about aspects of live theater was
that it was supported and attended mostly by Jews and homosexuals,
making this play something of a perfect fit. Add in a Dietrich-esque
drag queen, a bit of full-frontal nudity, a lot of blood effects, and a
scene between the then-unknown Richard Gere and David Dukes as two gay
Nazi concentration camp residents brazenly talking each other to orgasm
without touching, and there was much reason for its success back
then—but not its endurance today.
The style and genre of Sherman’s most famous play has always been all
over the map, something even more evident in today’s more media-savvy
era with a more demanding audience adept at scrutinizing all artistic
endeavors. The first, almost campy and gay-humored scenes could have
been written by Harvey Fierstein. But soon, as those wacky Lucy and
Desi–like boyfriends Max and Rudy (Patrick Heusinger and Andy Mientus)
escape their flat in Berlin with the SS in hot pursuit, Bent
seems to turn into an homage to Steinbeck. After intermission, with Max
now alone and joined for his ill-fated stay at Dachau by the
pink-triangled Horst (Charlie Hofheimer) to spend most of the rest of
the play moving rocks from one side of the stage to the other, Sherman’s
script feels like a lost work by Samuel Beckett; one almost expects one
of our heroes, as they pass each other on their totally useless quest,
to remind the other that it’s still Godot’s appearance they’re
anticipating.
Heisinger, Mientus, and Hofheimer
are outstanding actors, but, oddly, there is not a lick of sexuality
emanating between any of them. This lack confounds and dilutes the
horrific resolution of the bond between Max and the sweetly whiny Rudy,
and is even more emotionally deflating when Max and Horst, in the play’s
most notorious scene, must stand at attention and make love only with
their words and thoughts.
Many fascinating characters weave through the play, including—in a
wonderful turn by Ray Baker—Max’s closeted “fluff” uncle Freddie. But as
Greta, Rudy’s cross-dressing boss who takes a bribe from the SS to show
them where the boys can be found, Scissor Sisters’ lead singer Jake
Shears, in his acting debut, is a bit of a disappointment. Granted,
“Streets of Berlin,” Greta’s flashy musical number, is suitably
spectacular, especially with Kaufman’s inclusion of scantily clad
dancing boys in leather harnesses— choreographed by the inimitable Ken
Roht to wind around Shears and complete with a show-stopping entrance
borrowed from Mick Jagger in the film version because, well… because the
Taper can. Still, the importance of Greta’s song is not the spectacle
but in the words, as the world-weary club owner realizes and mourns
midsong that his days in Berlin and the end of the Weimer era have
arrived, something that, in the dressing room scene following the
number, must be even more apparent. Although Shears is a treat as a
musical performer, as the stomach-sick Greta, he totally misses the
point.
That aforementioned ending tableau is indeed inventive and touching,
as was the decision, for opening night at least, to hand departing
patrons lit candles to place in the water surrounding the theater,
floating in memoriam of those many lives lost in the last century’s most
brutal horror. Today, however, nearly four decades since Bent made its initial impactful statement, it has all been said and done much better.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
July 27, 2015
The Biscuiteater
The Electric Lodge
Whether genetically predisposed or trained well at his granddaddy’s knee, Jim Loucks has the knack for telling stories large and small. In this solo show, Loucks layers recollections from his youth and builds a powerful piece about guns, death, and dignity.
The individual moments Loucks experienced with his grandfather may at first seem like filmy tulle, but they weave together into Kevlar. The young Loucks grew up in small-town Georgia with absentee parents: His father preached, his mother disappeared to work at a dress shop. Fortunately for Loucks, Granddaddy sat on his front porch and dispensed life lessons—the only model of elegance, strength, and wisdom in the young lad’s life.
Loucks admiringly recalls how his grandfather handled a tiny neighborhood bully—with a poem written, apparently on the spot, lauding the tot’s better qualities. That was long after Granddaddy, the town’s former police chief, killed a black man, spending the remainder of his life living under the guilt and regret. So he taught his grandson to be strong and yet to value all fellow creatures. Grandma figures in here, too, telling of her newlywed husband’s kindhearted but laughing patience, and revealing the great man’s physical flaw of two spindly legs.
Under Lisa Chess’s direction, the piece feels warm, inviting, and yet purposeful, and it builds and ebbs in an inescapable wave. Loucks “does” all the characters, from neighborhood kids through the old-fashionedly feminine grandmother, but he does them so subtly, and the transitions among them are so invisible, that the audience is never forced to watch a show of aping and can instead remain immersed in the tales.
Just as simply and subtly, Sibyl Wickersheimer’s scenic design of two flats painted with symbols of the stories, plus a few rehearsal boxes and a slightly raised platform representing the porch, are ample visual cues for the audience. Moods are further established by lighting designer Stacy McKenney’s warm Georgian sunlight; and John Nobori’s sound design undistractingly melds with the storytelling.
A biscuit eater, as in the play’s title, is a hunting dog that, whether genetically predisposed or improperly trained, is gun-shy. As a child, Loucks greatly feared he was one, so he spent a period taunting the neighbor kids and maiming and then killing animals. Under Granddaddy’s kind but firm hand, the lad learned to be strong without ego.
Unlike his father, Loucks doesn’t preach. It’s probable the audience will leave wondering what his position is on gun control. But a gun’s aftereffects—on the victim and on the shooter—are described as poetically as Granddaddy’s ode to the little neighborhood bully.
Loucks’s delivery is sometimes impenetrable, the only fault to mar the perfection of this piece. Fortunately, so much is said, so artistically, that we get the picture even if a few strokes are missing.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
July 26, 2015
Romeo and Juliet
Independent Shakespeare Co. at the Old Zoo in Griffith Park
It’s
fair to say that having presented last year’s highly intimate, indoor
adaptation of this piece using only an eight-member ensemble, this
company can do it all, in a venue large or small. From the opening
sequence of a town square full of sword swinging rivals to the
gorgeously staged final tableau involving the doomed lovers, director
Melissa Chalsma brings to the massive “confines” of Griffith Park a
vibrant, full-cast production.
This time around, an onstage quartet of musicians, billed as The
Lively Helenas, named after one of the guests invited to the party at
the Capulets, inhabits stage left. Providing original rock-style
underscoring and songs, the drum-dominant music pulsates. And although
the performances are ramped up to accommodate this beautiful outdoor
locale and scenic designer Caitlin Lainoff’s towering set of gray panels
and polished chrome railings/platforms, Chalsma and company retain the
ability to magically lull one into a sense of security before this tales
turns so abruptly tragic.
Heading up the cast is the
incomparable Erika Soto, whose performance is a Juliet for the ages. As
stated by her Nurse, played with delightfully bawdy abandon by
Bernadette Sullivan, Juliet is a girl of “not quite 14.” Soto shies not
away from displaying her character’s bubbling exuberance. Likewise, as
the consequences of missed communications and uncontrolled rage begin to
ravage what might have been, her Juliet matures before our very eyes as
she faces choices far beyond her years.
As her romantic complement, Nikhil Pai is a Romeo whose dashing good
looks belie a young man who, in Juliet, sees that true love is far more
enthralling than mere lust. His scenes with Soto (and the balcony scene
alone is worthy of one’s attendance) are music to the ears, as these two
give wing to Shakespeare’s words. Likewise, Pai’s lamenting of
banishment to his confidant, Friar Laurence, played with all the dry wit
David Melville can muster, tugs at the strings of the heart.
Supporting roles range from
servants, watchmen and citizens—played by William Elsman, Jack
Lancaster, Ashley Nguyen and Xavi Moreno—to the better-known characters
whose actions create the ever-circling spiral of doom.
Evan Lewis Smith is a Tybalt whose testiness quickly gives way to
fiery rage. Sean Pritchett and Aisha Kabia make for a stunning Lord and
Lady Capulet. It’s easy to believe this well-heeled pair, gorgeously
costumed by Houri Mahserejian, has sired Soto’s delicately beautiful
Juliet. Pritchett, in particular, commands the stage as he rages over
Juliet’s resistance to her arranged marriage to Paris, played with a
benign naiveté by Vladimir Noel.
Across the aisle is Faqir Hassan’s portrayal of Romeo’s father, Lord
Montague, as a seemingly gentle man whose reaction to the goings on is
more confused sadness than hatefulness. His nephew, Benvolio, originally
written as a male cousin to Romeo, is given a relatively successful
gender twist as played by Mary Goodchild.
Joseph Culliton’s portrayal of Escalus, Prince of Verona, is one of
concerned strength for his kingdom. As Mercutio, André Martin presents
an almost unimaginably outrageous character. Whether appalling the
story’s other characters with his ribald inappropriateness or cavorting
throughout the audience as he delivers the well-known monologue
concerning Queen Mab, Martin’s performance is a tour de force—so
captivating that when Mercutio is fatally struck at Tybalt’s hand, gasps
were heard from numerous theatergoers at this shocking portent of even
worse things to come.
Reviewed by Dink O’Neal
July 23, 2015
Who Killed Comrade Rabbit?
Blank Theatre
Alexander
Mushkin was on his way to becoming a major player in the Moscow Art
Theatre—at least in his own eyes. After appearing as an understudy for
the role of Treplyov in the original production of The Seagull,
the actor’s descent into alcohol cost him his marriage and his career.
As Anton Chekhov once observed, it’s not, as many people might expect,
the sound of the applause that draws someone to an acting career. “All
it is,” the great playwright believed, “is the strength to keep going no
matter what happens.”
As Willard Manus and Ilia Volok’s solo play unfolds backstage at the
Russian theater complex in 1937, Mushkin (played here by the Moscow
Arts–trained Volok), having been reduced to minor player status, is
somehow content despite being relegated to playing a giant bunny in the
company’s children’s theater wing as punishment handed down upon him by
his guru Konstantin Stanislavsky. Mushkin has been sober for 100 days
and in return is not-so-patiently waiting for a phone call from the
master to tell him the reward for his sobriety will be the title role in
the company’s upcoming production of Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya.
Soon, however, there appears a glitch in his expectations as he
changes out of his rabbit costume in his cramped dressing-room/living
space in the bowels of the theater. He receives a notice from the Soviet
Secret Police to appear before them for questioning concerning possible
subversive activity within the company. Hearing a news report that one
of his colleagues has been executed by firing squad and another
disappeared totally after just such an interrogation, Mushkin faces two
choices, both at odds with each other. On one side of the stage is a
huge portrait of his beloved leader Joseph Stalin; on the other is a
scrutinizing photo of Stanislavsky staring down at him through his
pince-nez. Whether Mushkin agrees to cooperate with one of his country’s
liberators or rats out his great mentor in an effort to save himself is
at issue.
Under the skilled and passionate
direction of the legendary Barbara Bain, this project, curated with her
guidance at The Actors Studio, has much to offer. Volok is a dynamic,
compelling performer, able to pull off an extremely broad and
over-the-top characterization because everything he does emanates from a
deeply committed sense of his own truth; as his character’s master
would have said, begin from a base of reality, and a great actor can
make any behavior work.
The script needs polishing. As is, there’s still an aura of
acting-workshop lingering here, as though it germinated directly from
one of Uta Hagen’s Physical Destination exercises. As Volok continuously
relies on heavy breathing to convey Mushkin’s anxiety or trolls through
trunks and drawers muttering Beckettian mantras such as “My hat…my
hat…” over and over, the monotonous dialogue is then replaced by another
search for something else not in the troubled guy’s immediate
proximity. Trying to find a disguise to make an escape before the police
come to pick him up, or discovering his wife’s wig from her turn as
Nina Zarechnaya makes him wail his loss for her with equal repetition,
until finding a bottle of vodka calms his behavior considerably.
Interestingly, whenever Volok’s character goes off into reciting one of Treplyov’s gloriously poetic speeches from The Seagull,
or starts delivering Shakespearean soliloquies by Hamlet, Richard III,
and Marc Antony, the piece instantly soars to new levels and quickly
establishes what a truly magnificent actor Volok is. As is, this is an
extremely promising work-in-progress; add some more satisfying dialogue
revealing more of Mushkin’s backstory to keep our interest and give the
dynamic Bain more thought-provoking material with which to paint, and
this could be a far more evocative production.
A small point: The plain manila
envelope Mushkin receives containing his police summons undoubtedly, in
1937, would not have featured a clearly visible computer barcode on the
back facing directly toward the audience only a few feet away. Nothing
in Who Killed Comrade Rabbit? indicates it’s meant to address time travel.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
July 20, 2015
Brighton Beach Memoirs
Kentwood Players at Westchester Playhouse
For good reason, playwright Neil Simon has been loved by the theatergoing public for decades. For even better reason, his Brighton Beach Memoirs
is widely considered to be among his best plays. In Kentwood’s
production of it, this 1982 work remains as charming, hilarious, and
bittersweet as ever, thanks to top-of-the-line portrayals of Simon’s
iconic roles.
Dreams deferred are at the root of this play. They cause conflict and
they inspire growth. For 15-year-old Eugene Jerome, living in Brooklyn
in 1937 means he dreams of playing for the Yankees. But this character, a
stand-in for the playwright, also dreams of being a writer.
There will be no athletic future for Eugene, nor was there one for
Simon. But as portrayed here by the delightful Matthew Van Oss, Eugene
clearly has the wit and perspicacity to write. And he has a family full
of quirks and woes, the gift that keeps on giving to a playwright.
Eugene is infinitely more good-natured than the irascible Simon ever has
been. Then again, even with the universal travails, his childhood seems
infinitely sweeter than Simon’s.
Packed into a compact but immaculate house (sturdy, appealing scenic
design by Jason Renaldo Gant) are Eugene’s parents, Kate and Jack;
Eugene’s elder brother, Stanley; and Kate’s sister, Blanche, and
Blanche’s two daughters, Nora and Laurie. New frustrations, old
jealousies, illnesses, and financial troubles plague the characters. All
are ultimately handled with loving care.
Throughout the play, Eugene serves as the audience’s tour guide,
observing his family with sharp eyes and an acerbic tongue. Anything he
might have missed, however, has been noted by this production’s
director, Valerie Ruel. The cast evidences a deep understanding of the
characters’ interrelationships and histories, as well as their secular
Jewishness, keeping themselves and the audience immersed in the
tumultuous lives of the Jeromes.
Ruel creates a feeling of living
in another era, not necessarily mimicking the 1930s but of a more
genteel time and place. That doesn’t mean Eugene has the purest of
thoughts and the most refined turn of phrases, however. But lust for his
cousin Nora and his cajoling Stanley into revealing ever more data on
the facts of life clearly mark this 15-year-old as someone from much
earlier, more innocent times.
Ruel’s cast is outstanding, some of the actors turning in portrayals
as good as if not better than those seen in the “big” productions of
this play. Particularly impressive are Lori Kaye, whose Kate is a loving
lioness, and Katie Rodriguez, whose Laurie, usually played as a somber
little pill, delights in her manipulativeness.
Louis Gerard Politan is luminous as the noble, probably greatly
idealized Stanley. Laura Slade Wiggins is a dewy, sadly frustrated young
Nora. Veronica Alicino is a heartsick Blanche, trying to do right by
her family. Harold Dershimer is a sturdy yet solicitous Jack, a model of
old-fashioned American ethics.
But, of course, Van Oss must carry this show, and he does so on
energized young shoulders, mining the meaningful comedy and tender
poignancy out of every line and situation.
To top this excellent work, costuming (designed by Marie Olivas),
particularly the enchanting but very simple outfits for the women, helps
take the audience back in time to days when problems weren’t less
burdensome but somehow seemed soluble. And it’s good to know Eugene’s
dreams ultimately came true.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
July 13, 2015
Republished courtesy Daily Breeze
Picnic
Antaeus Theatre Company
William Inge’s Pulitzer-winning classic Picnic
must have been a provocative original when it debuted in 1953, a time
when the pastoral lifestyle inhabited by people living in the
unforgiving American heartland had previously been relegated only to
corn as high as an elephant’s eye and love finding Andy Hardy. Inge’s
insular insight into the drab day-to-day existence of the townsfolk in
this bucolic community located somewhere deep in the middle of Kansas
was something new—something akin to Chekhov daring to present the
dysfunctionality of former aristocrats in post-Revolutionary Russia, or
Clifford Odets sending New York taxi drivers striking to form a union.
Flo Owens, raising two daughters alone, wants more than anything else
to make sure they end up happier than she is. Life takes a dangerous
twist when hunky drifter Hal Carter shows up in town on a rail, stopping
everyone cold when he strips off his shirt to do errands on the
property of the Owens’s lonely neighbor Helen Potts. Flo’s instant
wariness toward Hal is not shared by her daughters: the beautiful young
Madge, who obviously feels both compassion and instant Tennessee
Williams–hot desire for Hal, and Millie, the gawky teenage wallflower
who got all the brains but not her sister’s looks. Confounding the issue
are the waves of sexual tension emanating between Madge and Hal, her
attention apparent to her mother and Alan Seymour, the wealthy “townboy”
who has been courting her all summer. Soon, as everyone else goes off
to the play’s pivotal picnic, Madge and Hal are having something of a
picnic all their own, parked under a bridge on the outskirts of town.
Wanton casual sex was not an issue explored in theater before people
like Inge—who, fortified by massive amounts of gin, simply started
typing. Yet his unexpected and unfettered exploration of the taboo topic
of premarital sex in post-war America prophesized the ’60s sexual
revolution. This doesn’t guarantee that his work is easy to resurrect
these days. Although the circumstances Madge and her frustratingly
inward-looking family and neighbors endure hold up in many ways, in
other ways they do not. Inge’s glaringly stereotypical small-town
characters, trapped in intensely predictable situations, would have
remained more durable if Picnic had been a novel.
This is where the miraculous
Cameron Watson and the folks at Antaeus Theatre Company come in—and come
together. Watson directs as if re-creating a painting by an old master,
and, with the participation of some of Los Angeles’s most-impressive
actors and theater artists, this return to the colorlessly
inward-looking world of the Owens family and their friends is a glorious
success. In moments of true Watson, ensemble members stand around in
long moments of completely beaten-down silence; used and abused
“old-maid” schoolteacher Rosemary enters, after a long amorous night of
bootleg booze–fueled debauchery, to sit on the tree swing with her back
to the audience; and the audience watches Flo through her kitchen
window, as she is finally left alone and twirling slowly around the
cramped room, flabbergasted by having nowhere left to go or anyone to
help go there.
The design team is uniformly in top form, from Robert Selander’s
evocative and versatile two-story set to Jared A. Sayeg’s lovely
lighting effects, which turn the family’s farmhouse into a Grant Wood
painting, subtly mutating as it bathes the town’s entombed participants
in early morning light, then full sunlight and on to dusk. Terri A.
Lewis’s simple costuming also adds to the ambience, as does Jeff
Gardner’s impressive sound design, especially when the local wildlife
heralds in the dawn of a new morning and the train roars through the
town, craftily utilizing the former Deaf West Theatre space’s under-seat
woofers.
The production is double-cast—or,
as the company likes to refer to the practice originated when the troupe
formed in 1991, partner cast. There was not a bad performance anywhere
in either of the veteran casts on opening weekend. Oddly enough,
however, one ensemble was discernably more ready to open than the other.
Where one cast was filled with energy, extraordinarily effective in
telling the story and trusting Watson’s visualization, the other seemed
in need of a little more time to let the dirt between the characters’
toes sink in.
After a last-minute substitution of Jordan Monaghan as Madge as part
of both casts, Monaghan’s participation was revelatory. From the moment
she stepped on the stage in her second turn in the role, her vivacity
and playfulness, so missing two nights before, was not only intact but
substantially more interesting. It seemed fairly apparent this might
have been due to her onstage relationship with Jason Dechert’s
engagingly charismatic Hal, the sexual sparks between them, so vacant in
the other coupling, producing so much heat that the producers might
consider passing out paper fans to audience members whenever the pair
performs together.
All the performances here are skillful and committed, even if some
are more successful than others at this stage of the game. Rhonda
Aldrich is especially noteworthy as Flo, her desperation with where her
life has gone heartbreakingly defined. Matthew Gallenstein is a
particularly memorable Alan. Kitty Swink and Janellen Steininger bring
wonderful pathos to the role of Mrs. Potts. Although Jackie Preciado is
far more physically right than Connor Kelly-Eiding as the awkward yet
richly engaging Millie, both actors are charming in the role.
In some of the play’s eclectic
cameo roles, Dylan Jones is a standout as Rosemary’s super-perky
co-worker Irma Kronkite, who could singlehandedly make anyone stop
thinking about attending his or her impending high school reunion; and,
as Bomber, the horny, overconfident kid paperboy who opens the play
lobbing verbal barbs with Millie, Ben Horwitz and Jake Borelli
commendably set the scene and create the era, making the audience feel
it’s right back home, wherever that may be.
Gigi Bermingham and Shannon Holt as Rosemary could not be more
different in their interpretations, yet both are striking in what they
bring to the role. Bermingham is far less put-together than how she is
usually cast, while Holt is infinitely more simple and unadorned than
usual. The result is quite fascinating—and could be the poster child for
Antaeus’s commitment to double-casting.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
July 1, 2015
Bad Jews
Geffen Playhouse
In the West Coast debut of Joshua Harmon’s hilariously and savagely discursive Bad Jews,
it’s almost uncomfortable being a fly on the wall of millennial
brothers Jonah and Liam Haber’s Upper Westside Manhattan studio
apartment bought for them by their wealthy parents. When their
less-well-off cousin Daphna (“Compared to your family,” she complains,
“we’re like the Joneses”) plops down on an air mattress on their floor
while in town to lay their beloved concentration camp survivor
grandfather to rest, long-smoldering sparks instantly ignite—especially
when Liam shows up the evening after the funeral because he lost his
cell phone on his skiing trip to Aspen, arriving with his latest in a
string of cheerfully vacant shiksa girlfriends on his arm.
Israel-obsessed rabbinical student Daphna is a terminally whiny,
intensely angry, resolutely Jewish-identifying motor-mouth. Liam begs
his blonde airhead girlfriend, Melody, not to offer any pertinent
information to Daphna, because it is traditionally absorbed, rattles
around in her miserably unhappy brain, and then gets spit back with an
expert ability to seek and destroy. This is particularly true when she
points out to anyone around her the depth of her personally solemn
cultural and religious commitment. The brothers don’t seem to share this
commitment, and this infuriates her. For Liam, however, Daphna is
“about as Israeli as Martin Fucking Van Buran.”
As played by Molly Ephraim with an
obvious nod to the discernably accomplished directorial hand of Matt
Shakman, Daphna emerges as the fast-paced comedy’s most memorable and
even sympathetic character. She is truly a nonstop monster: brusque,
frustratingly argumentative, unbelievably annoying, and with a voice
that could give anyone a migraine in about two minutes. It’s not usual
for such a personality to emerge as someone audiences appreciate or with
whom they identify, but the unearthly depth of Ephraim’s creation,
fashioning Daphna as somebody who never for a moment relents from her
abrasive conduct, but who still subtly lets her character’s monumental
sadness, insecurity, and loneliness show through, makes her one of the
most multifaceted antiheroes since Charles Laughton assayed Inspector
Javert.
As Liam, who should have checked into a hotel or at least should have
downed a handful of valium before greeting his adversarial cousin, Ari
Brand is a perfect foil for Ephraim’s sharp verbal thrusts directly to
the gut, insisting on calling her by her birth name, Diana, as intently
as she spits out his Hebrew name, which unfortunately for him is
Schlomo. Lili Fuller, as that stranger in a strange land Melody, is in
contrast sweetly dumb yet truly endearing, especially when she
innocently takes on Daphna’s wickedly nasty challenge to exhibit her
abandoned training as an opera major, delivering the most sidesplitting
and unforgettable rendition of “Summertime” ever presented before an
audience.
Fuller and Raviv Ullman as Jonah
spend a lot of their time trying desperately to stay out of the fight
between Daphna and Liam. Even more than their lifelong hatred for each
other, this fight centers on inheriting their Poppy’s chai, the
religious relic their late grandfather inherited from his exterminated
father and wore around his neck all his life, except for his three years
in the camps when he kept it hidden under his tongue. Ullman is
impressive in the role of the quiet, hapless brother, delivering a
wonderfully subtle performance that, without words, provides a conduit
for the rest of us to look on as well—and with equal discomfort and
horror.
Perhaps you need to be a bit of a bad Jew to truly appreciate Bad Jews
in all its thorny, irreverent splendor—as evidenced by some of the
better Jews in attendance for the Geffen’s opening night performance,
many of whom sat stone-faced throughout the fast-paced intermissionless
90 minutes, looking as though they wished they could leave, never
considering for a moment breaking through with a tiny titter of
appreciation. Sadly, what they missed, by focusing only on what could
for some be highly offensive language and behavior, is Harmon’s far more
valuable message, which cuts through the biting humor like a knife and
ultimately is far more universal. Lord, what might be accomplished if
members of our muddled species would learn to swallow our pride and join
together to embrace our heritages, whatever that may be.
Bad Jews is
a play about sanctimonious comportment as it clashes headfirst with
egocentricity—and how such behavior trumps the precious and moving
history these particular people should be proud to share. The story does
not end with a neat reconciliation, leaving us to wonder if these
cousins, instead of worrying about who is treating whom the worst, will
ever resolve their differences. As with so many families, in all
cultures and stations of life regardless of religion, ethnicity, or
political differences, it seems as though this generation of the family
will be battling and pounding their own chests right through
Thanksgiving, on to Passover, and continuing over the next few decades
until they are left to bury one another. What we miss in our lives while
brooding about the past and lugging around grudges about how we’re
treated!
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
June 21, 2015
Songs of the Fall
Ruby Theatre at the Complex
Attending an entry in the Hollywood Fringe
Festival is a roll of the dice, especially when the production is an
original musical utilizing only the limited bells and whistles available
in a black box at the Complex. Many red flags surrounded the premiere
of Ben Boquist’s Songs of the Fall,
not least that it was touted as a “pop/rock musical with a fresh and
controversial take on the Adam and Eve myth,” promising to explore
themes of race, gender, addiction, and even reincarnation by asking
“what really happened in the Garden of Eden.” This might make some of us
who consider ourselves challenged by sappy musical theater offerings,
not to mention scoffers of the theory of creation, run for the exits.
The saving grace might be in the term “myth” to describe the show.
Songs of the Fall
is truly a diamond in the rough—or in this case, in the Ruby. Boquist’s
book is charming, and the show’s premise, as it zips back and forth in
time between Eden and present-day New York, is inventive enough, as is
his sweetly sincere performance as the generally clueless Adam. Still,
what indeed is remarkable about this quietly auspicious introduction to
his talents is the score. Judging from the song titles listed in the
program, expectations could easily initially be met with skepticism and a
few eye-rolls, but Boquist’s compositions are impressively
sophisticated and memorably lyrical, especially with Robert Rues’s
complicated arrangements that make them even richer.
Under director Whittney Rooks,
there’s something delightful in the wide-eyed wonder of Boquist’s
footie-pajama-ed Adam and Unati Mangaliso’s equally comfy Eve, though
his character emerges as the planet’s first doofus boyfriend and hers as
the first whiny, nagging woman, the pair sometimes giving off the air
of a couple arguing about cost versus cleaning power of some laundry
detergent in a TV commercial.
John Eddings as the wisely elderly Grey, Cody Hays as the
cross-dressing Prime, and the barely teenaged Aurora Blue as Cate are
part of one depiction of God, here called The We and living as homeless
people on the street of New York. All performers, including the miscast
Leanna Rachel as a Lucifer, someone who has to work way too hard to get
to evil, are infectiously earnest and sincere, although the singing
expertise exhibited proves somewhat uneven. The true breakthrough
performance here is the prepubescent Blue, who knocks her songs and her
performance way out into the continuous traffic of Santa Monica
Boulevard.
Like so many writers offering
their work for the first time in such a discerning public forum, Boquist
seems to include everything he has ever wanted to say, as well as every
tune he ever was proud to have composed, in this one outing. This
two-act, two-plus-hour show should be pared down considerably. As is,
the work begins to drag as the storyline and the music get a tad
repetitious. Above all small druthers, however, one thing is crystal
clear: This garden-fresh (pun intended) new kid on the block is an
amazing composer, and this work heralds a promising introduction to
someone who, in a fairer world than ours sometimes, could someday be
recognized as a formidable contributor to the art form.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
June 18, 2015
Private Lives
Little Fish Theatre
Appallingly feuding but passionately attracted couples are not new to the stage. Shakespeare drew them in The Taming of the Shrew and Much Ado About Nothing. Edward Albee penned them in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?.
Amanda and Elyot are quintessentially creations of the great British wit Noël Coward, in his 1930 play Private Lives. Coward, a master at cheekily spotlighting human foibles, gibes at the mores and marriages of his time. Amanda and Elyot had admittedly made each other miserable in their three-year marriage. Now, five years after they divorced, they find themselves on a balcony of a hotel at a French seaside resort. Unfortunately it’s the first evening of their honeymoons with their respective new spouses.
Elyot and his new wife, Sibyl, clearly aren’t the happiest of couples, either, as evidenced by Sibyl’s relentless probing into the causes of Elyot’s divorce. Meanwhile, Amanda’s new husband, Victor, is similarly interrogating Amanda. But once Elyot and Amanda catch sight of each other, the lust and the violence flow again.
The former couple runs off together, to her Paris apartment, where they hunker down as only English sophisticates can do. Their new spouses find them there—no sense asking how, nor, if it’s not too middle-class American to wonder, what each does for a living.
In the decades after Coward wrote the play, laws and mores have changed in the marriage department, but his points about love are evergreen, and those points are given further honing in this production, directed by James Rice.
The only disappointments here are in the design elements. The Act One balcony is packed with what look like paint-flecked tarpaulins tossed over presumably patio furniture—in reality hiding Act Two’s Parisian living-room setup. The audience would believe the setting is a badly neglected American backyard before it could possibly believe this is a honeymoon retreat on the English Channel.
Costuming is eye-catching though not period-defining. Garbing the hapless Victor in tails and spats might be a hint about his lack of couth, but it comes across as a design error.
Nonetheless, the actors soon lure the audience into the lives of these Bickersons. Rice’s cast may not display the frothy English sophistication Coward was known for, but the actors create real people onstage, particularly Rice’s two leads.
They are Noah Wagner, playing Elyot, and Amanda Karr as Amanda. In the role originated in London’s West End by Coward, Wagner gives Elyot a red-blooded presence. It’s needed, because Karr has a personality that envelops the stage. There’s no fear one or the other character will lose—nor get injured—in the verbal and physical battles that this romance comprises (excellent fight choreography by Mike Mahaffey).
By perfect contrast, Lukas Bailey makes a stiff-upper-lip Victor, and Leona Britton is a fluttery, wailing Sibyl. Elizabeth Craig completes the cast, playing the French maid, swiftly speaking only French and adding masses of Gallic disdain.
In real life, Amanda and Elyot would not be not the kind of couple with whom most of us would want to spend an evening. Fortunately, in the hands of Little Fish, they are separated from us by the nice, safe fourth wall of theater, so we admire the quality acting.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
June 15, 2015
Republished courtesy of Daily Breeze
Cookie & the Monster
Magnum Players at Theatre of NOTE
Most
of us had invisible friends when growing up. Some we conjured as furry
giant bunnies, others cuddly teddy bears, or, in the case of certain
future actor–theater writers, perhaps even a well-spoken talking version
of The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms
who followed him around everywhere, knocking down imaginary brick walls
on sour-faced unsuspecting passersby. For our heroine Cookie (a
marvelously deadpanning Jaime Andrews), however, her own personal
id-incarnate is really a monster, shouting orders at the side of her
pigtailed head like a drill sergeant on crack and slyly coercing the
poor impressionable child into one disastrous situation after another.
While Cookie is still an impressionable suburban child living at home
with her parents (Perry Daniel and Curt Bonnem), listening to Linda
Ronstadt, Chicago, and the Time-Life Christmas Album, her dastardly
Monster (Scott Leggett, who plays the role as though he were Oliver
Hardy doing a Louis Black impression) begins his lifelong quest to lead
her astray with the usual kid stuff, like talking back to her mother’s
friends or scaring off potential Barbie Doll–obsessed playmates. But
after puberty hits Cookie, Monster’s bad advice becomes infinitely more
dangerous: suggesting she hang out with black-lipsticked Goth girls,
experiment with a tempting variety of street and psychedelic drugs, and
give her high school’s most popular football jocks blowjobs behind the
bleachers after the game.
As written by first-time
playwright Andrews in what she calls a “fucked-up fact-based fairytale”
(there’s even an acknowledgement in the program’s special thanks section
to the “actual Scott Pederson,” the name she also gives her horny
football hero), Cookie & the Monster,,
with its untouchable reminiscences of terminal teenaged angst and one
wonderful, arrestingly cheery original song about teenage cutting (“Make
a little slice / Doesn’t that feel nice?”), is a quick-witted,
delightfully off-centered comedy so black it’s in danger of leaving
bruises.
As embodied by Andrews, Leggett, and a super-uninhibited cast of some
of LA’s funniest performers (including, aside from others mentioned,
Sunah Bilsted, Peter Fluet, and K.J. Middlebrooks), Cookie’s life
becomes an endearing and surprisingly hilarious journey. The Molly
Shannon–esque Erin Parks is a special standout in a series of wildly
disparate characters, including one of the stone-faced Goth girls and
Cookie’s eye-rolling elder sibling who softens her feelings for her
younger sister when faced with her own catastrophic illness.
Guy Picot sits in the booth, delivering “once upon a times” as the
disembodied offstage voice of the narrator, Sky Guy (get the sense,
judging from the name, that maybe the character was written for him?).
But as fun as Picot is to watch, it would be great if his Sky Guy could
instead perhaps be Downstage-Left Guy, placed at the side of the stage
in a big cushy red leather easy chair with the script in his lap and a
nice glass of merlot beside him on an end table.
Through all the raucous, wonderfully inappropriate laughs afforded by Cookie & the Monster,
if this was indeed, as Andrews suggests, something akin to what she
experienced as she traveled that rocky road from childhood precocity to
therapy-inducing post-adolescence to what appears to be moderately
well-adjusted adulthood, it’s a wonder she got here at all. It’s
impressive how willing and able she is, surely encouraged by the
obviously compatible collaboration of director JJ Mayes egging her on,
to eagerly and honestly cough up the pain of her early years and turn
the sputum into a rich, thick foam of nonstop laughter.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
June 12, 2015
Matilda The Musical
Ahmanson Theatre
The audience for the opening of Matilda The Musical
was packed with children, certainly drawn by the fact that this
wondrous production was adapted from the popular classic novel by the
late Roald Dahl, perhaps the most successful writer of children’s books
since Hans Christian Anderson or Lewis Carroll. And, like that of those
particular authors, Dahl’s work was not all about fuzzy bunnies or how
to adopt perfect manners to please one’s parents. His work was often
dark, twisted, and unruly, even perceived as potentially inappropriate
or troubling for his young readers by more-conservative critics. This
wily, celebratory musical adaptation of one of his most enduring works
is no exception.
The multi-award-winning Matilda,
which before landing here took London and New York by what a character
calls her “ouchy front bottom” is, like the rest of Dahl’s prolific body
of work, an edgy, incredibly inventive offering. Thankfully, it’s one
for the history books that can help upgrade the perception of musical
theater as merely the place where people consider the problems of Maria
and try to get to the church on time.
Dahl’s story follows the title
character (impressively played opening night by Mia Sinclair Jenness), a
brilliant little lassie who devours novels that include Jane Eyre and Crime and Punishment,
much to the horror of her disapproving family who won’t even
acknowledge that their “creep of an offspring” is a girl. Her gloriously
slimy used-car-salesman father (Quinn Mattfield) sings a number right
to the audience: telling the kiddies that they don’t need anything but
the telly to help them grow up to be just like him, and stating that TV
is “All you need to fill your muffin/Without really having to think of
nuthin’.” Matilda’s mother (Cassie Silva) has a breakneck schedule as a
parent since microwaves don’t cook themselves, and, when she’s not
practicing her… um…moves with her overbuilt competition dance coach
Rudolpho (a hilarious Jaquez Andre Sims), she follows her mantra that
“Looks are more important than books.”
Everywhere Matilda turns, she is met with disapproval and shock that
she is smart, except when visiting her friend Mrs. Phelps (Ora Jones) at
her beloved library or when her promise is noted by her sweet new
teacher Miss Honey (Jennifer Blood). But even that is not enough to keep
our pintsized heroine from the clutches of her school’s dastardly
bulldyke-y headmistress Miss Trunchbull (Bryce Ryness in the most
outrageous nightmare-inducing drag since John Travolta played Edna
Turnblad), a dastardly former Olympic hammer thrower whose motto is
“Bambinatum est maggitum (children are maggots). It’s Trunchbull’s
belief that to teach a child, one must first break that child—the
practice of humiliating or otherwise torturing her wee charges being
something she admits “gives me a warm glow in my lower intestine.”
The all-stops-out adult ensemble
is genuinely glorious, under Matthew Warchus’s animated direction,
obviously encouraged to play the cartoon quality of their characters for
all it’s worth. Ryness is particularly memorable as Trunchbull, his
“The Hammer” and “The Smell of Rebellion” proving to be two of the most
delightful musical offerings of the evening. Mattfield and Silva are
equally courageous in their comic abandon, as is the hysterically
low-key Danny Tieger as their worshipped elder son Michael, whose
sweatshirt proclaiming “genius” emblazoned across the chest could not be
farther from the truth.
Jenness (who alternates in the demanding role with Gabby Gutierrez
and Mabel Tyler) is an understated standout in the title role, one that
doesn’t allow much offstage time to recover, and the children’s ensemble
is jam-packed with adorable and infectiously precocious kiddies belting
and tumbling into our hearts at every turn. If anything is amiss in
this mounting of the musical, however, it is in how often difficult it
is to understand the words of Dennis Kelly’s ingenious book or the
lyrics of Tim Minchin’s masterful score when intoned by the children in
the cast. Perhaps due to the thickness of the kids’ faux-cockney accents
or the problems inherent in sound designer Simon Baker’s efforts to
overcome the cavernous Ahmanson’s echoes, the fact that the adult
performers are able to be understood makes it seem the problem is not
insurmountable as the run continues.
It’s a shame when anything cannot
be heard here, since Kelly and Minchin have together created such an
incredibly masterful homage to Dahl—one that keeps the children in the
audience enthralled, despite the production’s nearly three-hour running
time, while never missing the opportunity to add quips and situations
for adults to savor as they zip directly over the heads of the young
ones. There’s a wonderful Pee-Wee’s Playhouse
feeling about the proceedings, with deliciously exaggerated
characterizations and designer Rob Howell’s costuming only adding
further colorful embellishments.
From the opening number “Miracle,” which sends up parents who dote on
their children as the main reason for living, to brilliantly onboard
choreographer Peter Darling’s energetic staging of the children’s
“School Song” and his cleverly tongue-in-cheek parody of Spring Awakening
in the eleventh-hour “Revolting Children,” to paeans to the glories of
ignorance and of being “Loud” (a showstopping tango number performed by
Silva and Sims), nothing is off-limits for bookwriter Kelly, director
Warchus, and this gloriously gifted comedic company of players.
The true star of all this, however, is the amazing score and lyrics
by Minchin (aided by knockout multilayered vocal orchestrations by Chris
Nightingale), which continuously accentuates Dahl’s original message,
an important reminder to kids and adults alike: that although we can’t
choose how we’re born or how we’re raised, we sure can choose to take
over from there, manage our own lives, and work tirelessly in our brief
time on this conflicted planet to create our own happiness.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
June 8, 2015
Love, Loss, and What I Wore
Laguna Playhouse
Not
many men would associate pivotal moments in their lives with clothing
items, but most women can relate to Nora and Delia Ephron’s witty play
based on Ilene Beckerman’s 1995 bestselling book of the same name. Five
actors are seated on a stage with scripts at hand, if needed, and they
recount life’s experiences through tales of prom dresses, wedding gowns,
shoes, purses, and the like. While a seemingly trivial exercise, it
manages to link birth, sex, rape, marriage, divorce, and other triumphs
and adversities to what they wore at the time.
The leading character is Gingy (Nancy Dussault), who is Beckerman’s
alter ego. Aided by a rack of simple drawings of garments on posters,
Gingy recounts moments of her life from childhood on. As she finishes an
anecdote, the spotlight turns to the other actors beside her: Lisa
Hale, Amber Mercomes, Dee Dee Rescher, and Erika Whalen Schindele. They
represent all ages and sizes, which makes them relatable to nearly every
woman in the audience. Though this theater piece is definitely not
aimed at men, it might provide an insight into their wives, sisters, or
mothers as the stories unfold.
Gingy announces topics—The Closet, Black, The Dressing Room—and the
women riff on their personal encounters. One talks about getting her
first training bra, another describes high heels and the concomitant
discomfort, a third tells of her near-traumatic inability to keep her
purse organized.
Not all topics are lighthearted.
An account of breast cancer and its anguishes adds an evocative moment
to the tales. A rape is described in an almost detached way, reflecting
soberly on things that happen to women all too often. Their recitals of
love are not all hearts and flowers.
Rescher’s quirky personality gives her the comic edge, and she mines
every moment she is featured in. Schindele is young and adds a fresh
voice to the stories. Mercomes is warm and speaks perceptively about a
gang sweater she wore. Hale provides a serious emotional edge in her
breast-cancer account that chills but inspires. The veteran Dussault is a
natural, and her presence anchors the other women. Her artistic
attempts at drawing a clothed figure is a most charming moment of the
play.
Director Jenny Sullivan has a feel for the Ephron sisters’ sharp narrative. For those familiar with their works—When Harry Met Sally, You’ve Got Mail, Sleepless in Seattle—the
stories will strike a familiar chord. Sullivan allows for individuality
but focuses on their mutual understanding of each other’s
contributions.
At the conclusion of the
performance attended, some women in the audience broke out in cheers,
acknowledging their connection to the topics that resonate so well. The
casting of this combination of actors and their skillful execution goes a
long way toward making the play relevant and enjoyable.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
May 26, 2015
Around the World in 80 Days
Actors Co-op
Jules Verne’s novel Around the World in 80 Days
has been made into films, most notably twice: in 1956 in Mike Todd’s
celebrity-studded epic with David Niven and Cantinflas, and in Disney’s
2004 version with Steve Coogan and Jackie Chan. The novel has been
adapted for the theater several times, along with this version by Mark
Brown in 2001. Even Verne, however could not have imagined the wildly
enterprising comedic touches that could be applied to his
action-adventure novel.
As staged by Actors Co-op, Brown’s version is a collaborative
enterprise among five actors—Eva Abramian, Andrew Carter, Kevin Coubal,
Philip Kreyche, and Bruce Ladd—and its director, Rhonda Kohl. It is
clearly as much fun for its actors as it is for the audience.
In it, Phileas Fogg (Kreyche) wagers £20,000 at his Reform Club that
he can traverse the globe in the titular period. He engages a servant,
Passepartout (Carter), and they set off by rail and steamship to reach
London in 80 days at precisely the same hour as they left. Locations
such as India, Egypt, China, and Japan allow for some clever stagecraft,
as well as an assemblage of delightful costume changes.
Keys to the success of this Actors
Co-op production are an engaging narrative that ties scenes together,
fast-paced direction with latitude for whimsical comic touches, and a
synergy among cast members that makes believable the fanciful stratagems
employed to get the job done.
Kreyche is a sober and precise Fogg. His no-nonsense confidence
stands in stark contrast to the loyal but beset-upon Passepartout; the
bumbling surety of Scotland Yard Detective Fix (Ladd), who is certain
Fogg is the bank robber he has been charged to bring in; and the myriad
citizens Fogg encounters who throw roadblocks in his path. His way is
eased with payoffs here and there.
Abramian plays multiple roles as a newspaper person, a priest, Fogg’s
former valet, but most notably Aouda, the Indian woman the companions
rescue who is to be sacrificed by suttee. As the play advances, she
becomes devoted to Fogg, and her performance is a gentle but
enterprising contrast to all the silliness surrounding her.
Carter’s Passepartout is nimble and crafty, even as he falls prey to
thieves and misfortunes. His hilarious French accent also fits the
farcical nature of the production. Coubal adeptly takes many roles
necessary to flesh out the story—from clerks, engineers, and porters to a
director of police and even a perfectly goofy judge who sentences Fogg
to jail.
David Goldstein’s marvelous set
design and Orlando De La Paz’s scenic artistry allow Coubal to emerge
expeditiously from multiple locations on stage, to the delight of the
audience. Victorian England as well as numerous foreign locations are
easily deduced from Wendell C. Carmichael’s fine costumes. Krys
Fehervari’s hair design, including numerous mustaches and hairpieces,
allows for many amusing moments.
Lighting by Matthew Taylor is effective throughout, and David B.
Marling’s sound design is notable for its variety and integration of
essential noises in action scenes. In a gunfight, the shots seem to be
coming from beside your theater seat.
So, forget the film versions. This adaptation of Verne’s timeless
story is clever from start to finish and makes a case for live theater
being one of the great pure art forms.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
May 13, 2015
Not That Jewish
Jewish Women’s Theater
In Not That Jewish
we encounter something distinctly unexpected: a first-person memoir by a
former standup comic that actually feels like a real play. Even more of
a surprise, it’s pegged to a particular demographic (i.e. Jewish women;
note name of theater company) while possessing enormous crossover
appeal. A fast-paced scrapbook, funny and heartwarming by turns, Monica
Piper’s life story proves an unqualified delight in the Jewish Women’s
Theater’s spacious yet intimate white-box space known as The Braid.
Piper’s broadest thesis is that identity is determined by the
qualities of one’s heart, not by one’s success or failure at following
the rituals and rules of whichever culture a person happens to be born
into. In the course of her journey (with stops for standup comedy, a
failed marriage, sitcom writing, adopting a son from a Christian single
mom, and breast cancer), Piper discovers that the characteristics most
needed for a soulful life—compassion, caring, respect, humor—are
available to anyone who chooses to tap into them.
Oy vey! I reread that paragraph and think, gevalt, the reader is going to think Not That Jewish
is some kind of sermon or self-help tract. Not at all: You don’t win
writing Emmys, work on Roseanne Barr’s staff, or secure recognition as a
Showtime Comedy All-Star if you’re a tub-thumping spiritual healer.
Rest assured that Piper’s take on life (hers and everyone else’s) is
infused with laughter, much of it of the belly variety. It’s just that
she’s seen enough tsuris, and learned from it, that she can’t help
passing along what she knows. And it all happens to be of the
sympathetic, healing variety.
Quick glimpse: Oncologist sits her down to give her “good news, we
found it early. And it’s small.” “How small?” “Um…it’s small.” “Is it
small enough that I don’t have to do all those 10K runs?”
I cannot imagine anyone’s not enjoying being in Piper’s company for
90 minutes. And if there are any such, I wouldn’t want to know them.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
May 11, 2015
The Anarchist
Theatre Asylum
There
was a time when a play by David Mamet meant wildly fascinating though
often dastardly characters shouting offensive personal viewpoints
regarding the world around them. Mamet’s “people” were, at the same
time, both shocking and entertaining. Yet, above everything else, they
were harbingers spouting strongly worded indictments of the ignorance
and greed rampant in our American milieu. What happened along the way is
a mystery, but his latest work, The Anarchist,
which understandably lasted a brief 17 performances on Broadway in
2012, is a deeply and unrepentantly conservative treatise that not even
subtly disguises the playwright’s far-right politics. Despite Mamet’s
obvious gift for writing dialogue, this play is as one-sided as Fox News
on steroids.
The premise here is that Cathy (Felicity Huffman), a ’60s radical
imprisoned for 35 years for murdering two police officers, sits in the
office of a prison administrator (Rebecca Pidgeon), meeting to discuss
her pardon before her nemesis of many years retires. With Cathy’s fate
clearly plopped in the hands of the other woman, Cathy tries any means
available, including her massive intellect and ability to debate issues,
to be able to feel the sun shine on her face again.
Ever read a work of philosophy or a
political essay with that constant little voice in your head asking
silently, “What does he mean by that?” or “And the answer is?” or “Why
does he say this?” or “How could he possibly think that is a cohesive
argument?” That’s exactly what The Anarchist
elicits, as Huffman proselytizes Mamet’s pigheaded (albeit articulate)
viewpoint and Pidgeon providing the voice inside one’s head. It is
hardly a play; it is more like a political pamphlet dropped from a plane
in a third world nation, only with the magnificent Huffman there to
soften the author’s 75-minute philosophical diatribe. Even Cathy’s
possibly convenient conversion from Judaism to born-again Christianity
is offensive to both sides, especially as written by Mamet. At least in
his Oleanna,
also a thinly veiled two-character debate on modern morality, there was
a tinge of subtlety that softened his narrow-minded argument.
Yes, of course Huffman is brilliant; she always is. Pigeon, the
author’s wife, who is referred to in this script as a “beautiful young
totem,” is a competent actor but wooden in a role with little chance of
being anything but. It’s interesting that, from his first female
creation, the ambitious yet cardboard-character secretary in Speed-the-Plow
on, Mamet has shown over and over he has little ability to write for
women. His default action is, again with glaring obviousness, to make
his most interesting women lesbians. This is true of his characters in
his first female-driven play, Boston Marriage, of the president’s speechwriter in November, and here again with the imprisoned Cathy.
As director, Marja-Lewis Ryan has
staged the limited action respectfully but still seems to have thrown up
her hands in frustration for not standing a chance with this material.
Sadly, the glory days of Mamet’s potential for greatness seem to have
gotten lost in his need to preach instead of provoke thought. The
predictable pingpong banter he pontificates in The Anarchist is akin to watching two actors perform Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,
only with neither the freshness nor the humor of Tom Stoppard. Mamet
was once definitely a wordsmith as promising as Stoppard, but Mamet
appears to have gotten lost in his own shouting from the top of his own
personal soapbox without consideration for his audience or interest in
creating a well-constructed play.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
May 11, 2015
Immediate Family
Mark Taper Forum
If you didn’t know, going in, that the director of Immediate Family
had a background in TV sitcoms, you’d get the hint in the first 10
minutes. The opening dialogue is that forced, the bickering banter that
aggressive, the pace that frantic. Some of it might’ve been opening
night jitters, because the cast at the Mark Taper Forum settles down
midway. But The Cosby Show veteran Phylicia Rashad did far better by A Raisin in the Sun,
in her exquisite 2011 local revival for Ebony Rep, than by Paul Oakley
Stovall’s well-intentioned, but lumpy and ideologically strained play.
It’s ostensibly a heartwarming ensemble piece in which the Bryants, a
semi-estranged set of African-American siblings and friends, return to
the old homestead in suburban Chicago to air old grievances on the eve
of a family wedding. Yet Immediate Family
quickly reveals its real agenda in focusing laser-like disapproval on
Evy (Shanésia Davis), a domineering Type A homemaker of deep religious
faith and deeper prejudice. Evy sets the house rules and stage manages
the whole shebang, and in almost a textbook definition of situation
comedy, each of the other characters seems to have been shaped primarily
to provide a different means by which they may incur her wrath.
Jesse (Bryan Terrell Clark), the middle son and aspiring writer, was
Evy’s soulmate throughout their youth, but he has disappointed her by
not following a glorious career path, not living at home, and, as she
sees it, choosing to be gay. Tony (Kamal Angelo Bolden), the baby of the
family and the impending groom, razzes her constantly and harbors his
own secret that will turn her pride into fury before long.
Nina (J. Nicole Brooks), Jesse’s outspokenly lesbian gal pal, can
always be depended upon to get Evy’s goat, but not so much as Ronnie
(Cynda Williams), revealed years before as the issue of their proud
pastor father and his white mistress. (To make Ronnie even more annoying
in Evy’s eyes, she’s a hard drinker and abstract painter who lives in
Europe.) Finally, Jesse’s white boyfriend, Kristian (Mark Jude
Sullivan), arrives to set the match to Stovall’s crudely arranged stack
of powder kegs.
There are still more contrived
clashes stuffed into 90 minutes, including Jesse and Kristian’s
differing ideas on their own possible nuptials. But the real problem
with Immediate Family
isn’t its plot. At least there’s always something going on and holding
one’s interest, and when attention turns to the family’s traditional
card game “bid whist,” the action fairly crackles with excitement. (It’s
no surprise to learn that the game was a favorite in the real-life
Stovall home, so richly does he lay out its details and dynamics, and
the cast grabs onto it as if it were Act Two’s dinner scene in August: Osage County.)
Nor is the author’s unfortunate treatment of Evy the biggest
drawback—though it’s telling about Stovall as a playwright that while
everyone (except saintly Kristian) gangs up on her unceasingly, she is
not once permitted to score any points on any of them. Everything she
does is bigoted, misguided, or vain, yet you have to give her some
credit for her ability to withstand all the judgments from the pack of
bullies she’s saddled with.
What’s most regrettable about Immediate Family
is its insistence on wrapping all of its conflicts in a sentimental
wash. There are serious issues at work here—issues of faith, sexuality,
legacy, marriage, and personal honor—that are currently pulling
families, and indeed an entire nation, apart. Yet virtually everything
plaguing the battling Bryants comes to resolution, and in less than 48
hours to boot.
Life doesn’t work out its tensions quite so neatly. A play that ought
to discomfit us, by virtue of its troubling subject matter, is content
to reassure and flatter. That’s what sitcoms routinely do, but in a
stageplay context it’s a missed opportunity and a shame.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
May 5, 2015
My Child: Mothers of War
Hudson Backstage Theatre
The world premiere of Angeliki Giannakopoulos’s innovative stage adaptation of her 2006 PBS documentary My Child: Mothers of War
features a 21-person cast telling the real-life stories, in their own
words, of mothers whose lives were radically changed when their sons
were shipped off to fight and die in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This astonishing piece of theater, featuring six high-profile actors
seated behind podiums “reading” the actual text spoken by the woman
Giannakopoulos interviewed in her film, proffers a crucial message about
the horrors of war and the obscenities perpetrated by these two twisted
conflicts in particular. And if there was any doubt, having three of
those courageous mothers and their weeping families in the audience on
opening night—a benefit for Fisher House in West LA, providing support
for the families whose veterans never returned—instantly solidified that
message. As Frances Fisher grabbed the face of Anthony Rey Perez, the
wonderful young actor playing her son, saying a final goodbye to him
before he shipped off to the “sandbox” for the last time, the real
soldier’s father, seated in the audience, choked out one tortured “Oh,
shit” before breaking into tortured sobs in his wife’s arms.
Under Giannakopoulos’s
appropriately spartan direction, Fisher leads a brilliant star-studded
cast that includes Melina Kanakaredes, Mimi Rogers, Laura Ceron, Monique
Edwards, Anna Giannotis, Maria Nicolacakis, and Jean Smart (who will
join the production this weekend after returning from making a film out
of town). Each woman enters the conflicted minds of those courageous
mothers whose sacrifices were so unnecessary. There is no question why
these actors have had such notable careers, as here they offer
heartfelt, unassumingly expressed, mesmerizing emotional journeys,
breathing life into these stories with expert grace and skill.
As in the aforementioned moment shared by Fisher and Perez,
occasionally the actors playing the mothers step out from behind their
podiums for individual scenes played opposite the actors appearing as
the sons they would never see again. Fisher also has a second moving
moment at her son’s grave when Rydell Danzie, as his sergeant, invades her privacy to apologize for not being able to save the son he had promised her to watch over.
Rogers is arrestingly stoic as her character recalls the moment “The
Three Deaths” knocked on her door—one black, one Asian, one Caucasian,
all politically correct soldiers—sent by the State Department to bring
her the worst news any parent could endure. “The first step is not
denial,” she relates, “it’s absolute recognition.” Rogers also proudly
shows the letter of regret she received from President Bush, marveling
that it is signed “in ink,” while Giannotis’s character adds her own
reaction to receiving the same letter: “I could use it in the bathroom.”
Kanakaredes’s mom recalls her son telling her by phone from Iraq that
the militarized Humvees they were driving each cost the government
$100,000 to trick out, leading her to wonder how our government could
afford that. After he tells her to Google the company contracted to do
the work, she discovers “Uncle Bush is on the payroll.” Later in the
story, she brings tears to those gathered as she remembers not being
allowed to see the covered destroyed face of her boy in his casket but
“could tell he was my skinny boy.” Edwards is also affecting as the
exceedingly religious mother who reassures her son that everything he
was doing was God’s will and he will be protected—until he isn’t. As she
learns of his death, Edwards raises her eyes heavenward to sincerely
query, “What went wrong?”
The soldiers—played beautifully by
Perez, Danzie, Brendan Connor, Juan de la Cruz, Michael J. Knowles,
Nick Marini, Randy Mulkey, Ozzy Ramirez, and Jah Shams—bring the story
even closer to our hearts, proving once again that heroes come in all
sizes, ages, ethnicities, and religious backgrounds. This is perhaps the
most powerful message My Child
conveys, especially as clips from the original documentary unfold to
the side of the stage. Especially moving is one shot of a returning
young soldier, stepping off a bus to be met by a sea of parents and
significant others joined to greet their loved ones, whose face quickly
dissolves into deep sadness when he doesn’t see anyone there to welcome
him home.
Of the dynamic ensemble cast, some actors appearing in alternating
roles depending on the performers’ schedules, it is Fisher, with her
steely eye and gravelly, slightly quavering voice, who leaves the most
indelible impression, delivering a striking, gloriously nuanced
performance.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
April 30, 2015
My Barking Dog
Theatre @ Boston Court
What
is an audience to make of characters who claim they’re telling the
truth but who clearly are not doing so? This question comes to mind as
Eric Coble’s poetic My Barking Dog
turns increasingly metaphoric and untrue to life. Whatever the script’s
ambiguity, its West Coast premiere run is exquisitely produced,
thoughtfully directed, and faultlessly acted.
At the start, in total darkness, the play’s two characters tell us
that their story, though perhaps not accurate, is true. Then the lights
come up, as Melinda (Michelle Azar) and Toby (Ed F. Martin) move through
their repetitive, angular, ugly daily activities. Melinda is a factory
worker, loading paper into a print machine. She works the night shift
because she doesn’t like being around other people. Toby, who lost his
office-management job nine months ago and who has not found work since,
crisscrosses his apartment with one arm extended, trying to find
wireless connectivity for his laptop so he can continue his job search.
They have lived in the same apartment building for five years but
never met until now. But while Toby constantly seeks connection, as he
repeatedly remarks, Melinda professes to thrive on the contemplation
solitude offers her. She is nurturing, the one who cares for a visitor’s
health and feelings, while she destroys the work of mankind around her.
Toby may be sexually adventurous or he may be a dreamer. What is the
truth about these unreliable narrators?
As for the play’s title, the
barking dog is a coyote that climbs the stairs of Toby and Melinda’s
apartment complex and, to put it mildly, makes contact with these two
isolated souls. The coyote might represent nature choked out of this
pair’s city. But, notably, the play’s title is “My” and not “Our”
barking dog. Quite likely the creature represents their individual, more
bestial natures.
And my, oh my, do those natures come out in full force, as director
Michael Michetti shepherds visible mankind and invisible beasts into
this vivid but unimaginable world. His work with his actors is
psychologically deep, bringing out truths about human nature.
Michetti’s stagecraft, too, is fabulously imaginative. In
collaboration with scenic designer Tom Buderwitz, lighting and video
designer Tom Ontiveros, and sound designer John Zalewski, Michetti
cracks open the stage, the characters’ psyches and the audience’s minds.
The stage begins as a square-cornered concrete structure. Scene-setting
projections show a barren grey expanse surrounding the apartment, but
colors shoot across the grey as the characters grow energized. Toby and
Melinda literally pull the rug out from under their feet and
figuratively do that to the audience. By the play’s end, the stage has
turned into root-bound earth. Shoes come off, clothing comes off—to a
respectable limit—and the two relish sinking into the soil.
Azar’s physicality, at first
mechanized and constrained, becomes bold and powerful. Although the
actor never leaves the stage, she drops decades, her character
transforming from exhausted, ill-kempt older-middle-aged night worker to
a young woman electrifyingly engaged in her new passion. Martin’s
angular reaching for connectivity over the ether becomes a wildly
sprawling dance in the earth, as he unpatronizingly makes gender and
perhaps species a fluid concept.
A startling, in reality impossible, occurrence ends the play. Perhaps
you were expecting a traditional love story here? That wouldn’t be
natural. Or truthful.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
April 27, 2015
Never Givin’ Up
Broad Stage
Anna
Deavere Smith is an American treasure. She is a vivid storyteller who
has mastered building monologues from interviews with those affected by
her subject matter. She captures the cadence and moods of the real
people she impersonates and finds the most penetrating details to flesh
out. Her 1994 play, Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992, reflects the LA Riots from many perspectives. Now, Never Givin’ Up
uncovers race relations, using as its centerpiece Martin Luther King
Jr.’s famous letter written on a newspaper as he sat in a Birmingham,
Ala., jail cell.
Smith reads the entire King letter, and though she does not
impersonate the reverend, she captures his passion and his clarity. Her
other monologues here focus on victims of American racism—from Charlayne
Hunter Gault, a student in the early 1960s who broke the University of
Georgia’s segregation history, to Georgia Congressman John Lewis, who
had been beaten by police in the 1960s, only to have one of the
perpetrators regretfully apologize in 2009. Smith’s soliloquies are so
rich, one can see the hostile girls with flowing white sheets staring
down young Gault her first night in the desegregated dorm, and the
upscale house, car, and coat with which future school principal Linda
Wayman’s mother motivated her to be the first in her family to enroll at
college.
Director Stephen Wadsworth makes
curious choices that dilute Smith’s powerful speeches. The two-piece
chamber (violin and piano) interludes feel unnecessary. Smith’s
monologues sing all on their own, making the music superfluous. It sets
no mood and only slows the evening. More troubling, violinist Robert
McDuffie and pianist Anne Epperson loudly underscore Smith’s gripping
interpretation of the King letter. She must fight them to be heard,
which strips the sting from his great words.
Those words are still so timely. Race relations are only scraping the
surface of healing, and other hatred continues as people attack the
LGBT community on “religious grounds.” Smith and her muse, Dr. King,
remind audiences that the road to equality still is a long journey.
Reviewed by Jonas Schwartz
April 17, 2015
Newsies
Hollywood Pantages Theatre
A
good rule of thumb for movie-to-musical adaptations is—and this isn’t
original with me; I’ve heard it from many of my buddies in the tuner
biz—if you’re dealing with a great movie, do something to keep it great,
but do so in a distinctly different way. Maybe The Lion King
is the preeminent example there. And if it’s a flawed movie, find some
way to make it great. The latter is tough, because there have to have
been reasons why the source material was floppo to begin with. But if a
creative team can find the key to unlocking the potent property inside
the stinker, it really can be magic time.
Which brings us to 2012’s Newsies,
which transforms the legendarily mediocre money-loser of 20 years
earlier—a sluggish saga of an 1899 newsboys’ strike, in which street
urchins endure armed combat at the hands of publisher Joseph Pulitzer’s
bullyboys—into one of the boldest, brassiest, most sheerly alive musical
entertainments in years. And I was delighted to discover that the
touring version, now at the Pantages, has lost none of its joie de
vivre. If anything, it could be more jubilant than in its original
Broadway run.
I have to admit that not only have
I had a long-standing fondness for some of the Alan Menken–Jack Feldman
tunes, but I saw the potential for a stage version even while watching
the Christian Bale–Ann-Margret–Bill Pullman starrer for the first time.
Of course, I pooh-poohed the notion right away: Disney would never go to
the expense of mounting another version of this financial disaster, I
reasoned. Even if they did, it would be impossible to keep a chorus of
kids singing and dancing at Olympic-contender skill levels for eight
shows a week.
Some prognosticator. It has proved no difficulty at all for
Tony-awarded choreographer Christopher Gattelli to assemble a
limber-limbed, abs-of-steel ensemble to glide, slide, leap, and
pirouette up and down Tobin Ost’s multitiered ironworks of a set. (Think
of the tic-tac-toe arrangement of Hollywood Squares, only forged in a factory.)
Meanwhile, the story problems
melted away at the hands of director Jeff Calhoun and, amazingly,
librettist Harvey Fierstein. I say “amazingly” only because the author
of La Cage aux Folles and star of Hairspray is better known for his tart dialogue than craftsmanlike construction, yet the Newsies
book, especially when compared with the original screenplay, really
works like a Swiss watch now. The central narrative of feisty,
chip-on-the-shoulder Jack Kelly (gifted and charismatic Dan DeLuca) is
firmed up with the introduction of a solid love interest (reporter
Katherine, played by plucky Stephanie Styles), while placing the
villainy of Pulitzer (a suave, strong Steve Blanchard) into starker and
more believable relief.
As a libretto, Newsies is no Sweeney Todd or Fiddler.
Yet now, not only does it make logical sense and play less predictably
on its way to the newsboys’ inevitable victory, but it becomes a solid
foundation for some of the most thrilling production numbers seen in
years. Honest. “Carrying the Banner” shows a cadre of youthful hustlers
working their butts off to make ends meet. “The World Will Know” and
“Seize the Day” are martial anthems for collective action. “Santa Fe”
serves as a plaintive I-want ballad for our rootless, restless hero,
while “King of New York” turns a celebration of making all of Gotham’s
front pages into the most irrepressible tap/clog number since…well,
maybe since “I Got Rhythm” in Crazy for You an eternity ago.
All of those songs, incidentally, were taken directly from the movie.
Some seven new tunes were crafted for Broadway, all of them forgettable
though enough to qualify Menken and Feldman’s work for the Original
Score Tony (which they won). Yet the score still seems to possess a
unity that many a musical would envy, a unity doubtless derived from the
story’s central idea: namely, the need for like-minded citizens to band
together for the common good. Newsies’ heart is completely in the right place, and it’s a timely place as well.
The athletic, almost gymnastic
dances from Gattelli have been criticized for being too showy, too “out
there,” too shine-it-on Broadway. Such carping misses the essential
point: that these kids’ showoffy struts and jetés and challenge dances
are exactly what the story demands. Newsies
is about a bunch of ragamuffins whom society, high and low, has written
off, and who decide to show the world what they’re capable of. That
desire is infused in every one of the colorful, gravity-defying numbers
and reinforced by the nonstop audience cheering as it builds to an
exuberant climax. The dance of Newsies is the theme of Newsies: the power of an ordinary human being to accomplish seemingly impossible things.
Profound and thoughtful, it ain’t. But moving and memorable? You betcha.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
April 1, 2015
Rodgers + Hammerstein’s Cinderella
Center Theatre Group/Ahmanson Theatre
Timeless fairytale magic is right here, right now, in Rodgers + Hammerstein’s Cinderella. This production is musically exquisite, visually gorgeous, narratively entrancing, and fun.
It seems to have turned for its source material to the Charles Perrault 17th-century Cendrillon.
So the musical’s book writer, Douglas Carter Beane, has put back the
second ball at the prince’s palace and taken away the wickedness of one
of the two stepsisters.
That’s all to the good of the storytelling and the music here. Two
big dance parties means twice the chance to hear Richard Rodgers’s
sweeping melodies and Oscar Hammerstein II’s evergreen lyrics. One
confidingly sympathetic stepsister means one more chance for a romantic
pairing in the story—this one with her own prince of a guy. Now, that
prince (David Andino) is not much in the looks department, but he’s a
community organizer and he really likes the nice stepsister, Gabrielle
(Kaitlyn Davidson). And he’s not shy about helping a royal prince in
need of political advice.
Yes, this is still Cinderella.
Among the many magical aspects of this show are its storytelling
surprises, introducing long-forgotten and brand-new elements. Even the
real prince is a delightful surprise here. He’s self-aware, he wants to
be doing something with his life besides slaying monsters, he’s willing
to listen to advice, and he knows a good woman when he sees one.
As portrayed by Andy Huntington Jones, he even sings and dances like a
dream, while charmingly managing the book’s self-deprecating humor.
Jones is perfectly paired with Paige Faure, who makes a generous,
intelligent, and of course glowing Cinderella. Their chemistry is
enchanting. Cinderella’s stepmother is of course still vile. But she is
not detestable, because the hilarious Fran Drescher plays her—albeit
apparently with a badly damaged voice. The prince, here an orphan, is
likewise manipulated by a parent figure: his advisor Sebastian. As
played by Branch Woodman, Sebastian snags so many of the good laughs
that his comeuppance feels joyous rather than retributive.
Mark Brokaw directs with a clear,
uniform vision, infusing the musical with a remarkable balance of
earnestness and humor. His stars sing in classic musical theater style
rather than in pop style. His ensemble performs with purpose and
individual characterizations. He also has gathered designers whose
combined artistry makes this one of the most visually exciting shows
around. The ballroom dances are worthy of a dance company’s, including
the unusual lifts of Josh Rhodes’s choreography, which is well-suited to
the balletically trained dancers.
Designed by Anna Louizos, the scenery flies fleetly into place. Yet
it serves evocatively as a rocky glen, cottage garden, cottage interior,
throne room, ballroom, and the obligatory palace staircase, which gets a
literal day in the sun in the last scene. That daytime, crafted by
lighting designer Kenneth Posner, could be the most gorgeous sunlight
ever created for the stage.
And yet, William Ivey Long’s costumes make the biggest splash here.
Cinderella is in her fireplace-cleaning garb, singing “Impossible,” when
her fairy godmother (Kecia Lewis) waves that famous magic wand. In an
instant, onstage in full view of the audience, Cinderella’s brown rags
become a filmy white ball gown, and her kerchiefed head becomes coiffed
with tidy curls and a sparkly tiara.
Lewis instantaneously gets a new outfit too, a vast purple affair,
which gives her the chance to spout one of the show’s funniest lines.
And then she and Faure switch the mood with a vocally wonderful,
thoroughly inspiring, “It’s Possible.” Indeed, this show proves things
are possible with intelligence, hard work, and open-mindedness.
Politics and romance make the
third couple here, as much destined for “happily ever after” as the two
other couples seem to be. With its melding of 1950s songs and 2013 wit,
this addition to the American musical theater canon is sure to seem
equally fresh in another 50 years.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
March 23, 2015
Switzerland
Geffen Playhouse
In her secluded bastion tucked away in the shadow of the desolate mountains surrounding Locarno, Switzerland, curmudgeonly recluse writer Patricia Highsmith (Laura Linney) is living out her miserable last months. She is reluctantly joined by a nerdy, Harry Potterish young envoy from her New York publishing house. He is Edward (Seth Numrich), the only person left at his firm willing to take on the infamously impossible crime novelist and persuade her to agree to a sixth return visit to her most successful anti-hero, Tom Ripley of the author’s bestselling The Talented Mr. Ripley books—a series so popular they’re known collectively to aficionados as The Ripliad.
It seems the last emissary sent to get Highsmith’s signature on the firm’s new contract ended up dealing with institutionalization and ongoing therapy sessions. Those resulted from the psychological trauma he received waking up one night in Highsmith’s guest bedroom with his certifiably nutso hostess leaning over his bed—and one of the impressively lethal-looking knives from her world-class collection of vintage weaponry placed unceremoniously at his throat.
Joanna Murray-Smith’s fascinating new play must have been a challenge to create, especially when blending the factual content of the last misanthropic gasps of Highsmith’s notoriously peculiar life and her legendary abrasiveness with the near-gothic literary bombshell blasts of a good fictional thriller worthy of a late-night read. Switzerland is as chockfull of as many twists and turns as any Highsmith novel, providing perfect homage to the work of the author, a person so bitter about our self-destructive, self-absorbed species that she spent a lifetime killing us off, fictionally speaking, in the most-diabolical ways possible.
It’s nearly as difficult to discuss Murray-Smith’s inventive tale without a spoiler alert. What can be considered here, however, is the production itself, elegantly tucked into the Geffen’s tricky smaller space by designer Anthony T. Fanning, who has brought to glorious life Highsmith’s Swiss fortress, complete with high walls of stone and a majestic view of the Alps, and adorned everywhere with her beloved collection of weaponry that could rival Sidney Bruhl’s in Deathtrap.
The most memorable thing about this production is Numrich, who makes an amazing transition in his character, ever-so-slowly graduating from a victim, almost cowering in fear of his nemesis, to a self-assured, coolly diabolical adversary worthy of any character Highsmith might have invented. Numrich is a talent to be watched, an actor with all the charisma and promise of an early Paul Newman.
Linney, however, who is at least 20 years too young to play this juicy role, does not fare as well, only managing to offer a predictable, cardboard interpretation of the author’s quirks, leaving Highsmith to never materialize as anything but a foul-mouthed cartoon character. Part of this might be in the casting of Linney, which certainly guarantees ticket sales but has hurt the storytelling drastically. As often seems to be the case with notable actors who’ve spent a long period working mostly in film and television, Linney seems to have forgotten how to take her role on a journey, how to assay a character arc.
Instead, from start to finish, she plays Highsmith as cold and unaffected by the changes around her, never bringing even a blink of apprehension or adding anything more than a sketchy questioning or chink in her armor. Perhaps this is a choice of Linney or director Mark Brokaw, but more than likely it is in the performance.
More appropriate for the role would be Estelle Parsons or Jane Alexander or Ellen Burstyn—or maybe one day Judi Dench or Meryl Streep in the film version—as long as they’re smart enough to still cast Numrich opposite her. He is destined for stardom in the near future. Let’s just hope he heads back to his theatrical roots occasionally so he doesn’t forget the basic rubric of acting that working onstage demand.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
March 15, 2015
End of the Rainbow
International City Theatre
Great talent is often accompanied by great torment. Judy Garland’s life was filled with frequent affairs, failed marriages, suicide attempts, and professional struggles even as she was declared by many to be the world’s greatest entertainer. Rather than trying to encapsulate that legendary life, playwright Peter Quilter has chosen to focus on a six-week period toward the end of Garland’s career as she tries to revive her flagging fortunes in a concert tour at London’s Talk of the Town nightclub. She is accompanied by her soon-to-be fifth husband, musician Mickey Deans.
Following last season’s portrait of opera star Maria Callas for International City Theatre, Gigi Bermingham now takes on the demanding portrayal of the iconic Garland. Rather than attempting impersonation, she and director John Henry Davis focus on Garland’s roller-coaster emotional vicissitudes and insecurities.
The scene opens with Garland and Deans (Michael Rubenstone) arriving at their hotel room. Garland is upbeat, but it is clear from the beginning that Deans’s first priority, taking on the role of manager, is keeping her away from alcohol and pills and getting her ready to perform. Also on scene is her longtime accompanist, Anthony (Brent Schindele, also music director for the production). The dynamic among the three elevates the drama from a celebrity tribute performance to a compelling look at human behavior.
Bermingham delivers Garland’s music with all the pathos and style required to emulate Garland’s emotional makeup. From “I Can’t Give You Anything but Love” to “The Man That Got Away,” Garland masks her failing health and addiction dependence as she takes the stage on Aaron Jackson’s effective Talk of the Town set. Accompanied by musicians Max O’Leary, Ashley Jarmack, John Carbone, and Schindele, the performance numbers are executed with dynamism and plenty of heart.
Schindele gives an affecting performance, particularly when Anthony tries to convince Garland to quit show business and marry him, even though he is gay. It is perhaps the finest moment in the show. Rubenstone effectively sends a mixed message as Garland’s savior and promoter. Also in a clever cameo is Wallace Angus Bruce as a radio interviewer trying to salvage a failing interview with the doped-up Garland.
In spite of the high quality of the production and Bermingham’s bravura performance, what’s missing is more of the real Judy Garland in the show. As accomplished a performer as Bermingham is, those who watched Garland over the years will notice an absence of her elusive qualities. Still, Quilter’s exploration of Garland’s tragic early demise at 47 is a cautionary tale that makes fine drama.
Reviewed by Melinda Schupmann
March 1, 2015
Washer/Dryer
East West Players at David Henry Hwang Theater at the Union Center for the Arts
At its essence, Washer/Dryer
is about a newlywed couple who need to clean up their lives. Playwright
Nandita Shenoy gives us Sonya, of Indian extraction, and Michael, of
Chinese. They apparently didn’t talk over their needs and goals
thoroughly before marrying. But here they are, living in her New York
studio apartment, the best feature of which is their own washer-dryer
unit.
Sonya (Rachna Khatau) and Michael (Ewan Chung) have been married for
one week. Sonya’s co-op agreement allows only single occupancy in her
unit, so Michael must lie to the doorman every time he comes home to his
wife. When his harridan of a mother (Karen Huie) comes to visit—which
she does with terrifying frequency—the doorman (unseen) becomes
suspicious of the goings on in that apartment.
Add in Sonya’s gay best friend Sam (Corey Wright), Wendee the uptight
president of the homeowners association (Nancy Stone) with a gay son
(unseen), and Sonya’s grandma in India (also unseen), and lessons about
tradition and acceptance abound here.
Directed by Peter Kuo with a sitcom sensibility, the piece feels like a pilot of the likes of Dharma & Greg.
Or, with its running time of 90 minutes, the pleasant if formulaic play
might suffice for the first four episodes. Of course, for those who
loved Dharma & Greg,
this is quite a compliment. The five actors here apparently satisfy
Kuo’s and Shenoy’s vision of this play, which seems to favor breezy
laughs over what could be pointed commentary on all marriages.
It fell to one actor on the night
reviewed to solve a problem that could have proven dangerous onstage.
From the moment Wright made his first entrances, it was clear his
character would be the show’s Cupid, the mediator, the Dr. Ruth,
bringing acceptance and understanding to the can of worms Shenoy opened.
As a bottle of “wine” began to leak over its shelf, dripping and
creating little splashes on the stage below it, the resulting puddle
drew least a portion of the audience’s attention. Would someone slip?
Would Wendee’s aqua-blue shoes be stained for the rest of the run?
Nope. Sam, crawling along the floor to avoid being spotted by mom and
Wendee while the women were absorbedly occupied in stir-frying dinner,
grabbed paper towels as he slithered by, mopped his forehead, and then
began to sop up the spilled liquid. Much as Sam is the story’s
problem-solver, Wright was this evening’s freshest, most-inspired
element.
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
February 20, 2015
Fugue
The Echo Theater Company at Atwater Village Theatre
This show has quite the pedigree. Its playwright, Tommy Smith, wrote last year’s insightful and inciting Firemen,
featuring abandoned characters in abusive and rescuing relationships.
Chris Fields directed that play to detailed perfection, cutting straight
to the crux of human relationships. Smith and Fields join their immense
talents here, adding a highly skilled cast to tell of three composers
who lived in three eras. So what went so wrong?
The work centers on the love triangles in the lives of the Russian
Pyotr Tchaikovsky (1840–1893), Austrian Arnold Schoenberg (1874–1951),
and Italian Carlo Gesualdo (1566–1613). The work’s title refers to a
musical form involving repetition and imitation. It also likely refers
to a psychiatric state involving a loss of identity. Bits about who each
composer was and his musical contributions flavor the script. Artistic
frustrations tie the three men together.
But Smith goes too far in trying to create a structural fugue: having
the characters speak the same lines at the same time to evidence their
common longings and struggles. Even if the actors could manage to get
their rhythms and inflections perfectly synchronized, the effect is
totally distancing.
Thus this work emphasizes form. So while the characters experience
heart-wrenching events, the audience remains almost constantly aware of
the architecture imposed on the storytelling. Give it this, though: The
script doesn’t feel like a Movie of the Week biopic or an “And then I
wrote” chronology of the composers’ lives.
Schoenberg (Troy Blendell) is in
an unhappy marriage to Mathilde (Amanda Lovejoy Street). She meets and
has an affair with Austrian painter Richard Gerstl (Jesse Fair). Prince
Gesualdo (Karl Herlinger) seduces and marries Maria (Jeanne Syquia), who
takes as her lover Fabrizio, duke of Andria (Justin Huen). Tchaikovsky
(Christopher Shaw) recently married his number one fan (Alana Dietze),
but he is overwhelmingly in love with his nephew (Eric Keitel).
It remains debatable whether the wives were coaxed into marriage or
whether they sought the fame their husband brought to the union.
History, at least superficially, tells us the men here were destroyed by
artistic insecurities. Smith may be showing that the more likely causes
of their breakdowns were disastrous romances.
By this time, the audience is pretty much hip to the “what” of this
production. The remaining question is “why.” Apparently the many
talented theatermakers involved here believed in the project, dressed it
up, and put it on the stage. Well, the dressing-up part worked out
beautifully. The production’s costumes, by Michael Mullin, are as good
as those that have graced the Ahmanson Theatre stage.
Fields bolstered the script with
some of the best actors in the city, as well as ensuring the actors here
look like their real-life counterparts. But so much of this script
induces puzzlement in the viewer. One example before letting this alone:
Toward the end of the play, Tchaikovsky begs his nephew to open a vial
of poison and drop the contents into a waiting glass of water, which
Tchaikovsky will drink. Why can’t the composer handle this task on his
own behalf?
There’s a lot of (simulated) sexual activity on this stage.
Presumably Smith wanted to show extraordinary people doing ordinary
things (assuming anal penetration with the hilt of a dagger is
ordinary). Just in case this choreography doesn’t convince the audience
of the composers’ passions, the red curtains surrounding the stage, and
the two red-draped beds, pound in the point (pardon the pun).
Reviewed by Dany Margolies
February 16, 2015
Sons of the Prophet
Blank Theatre at 2nd Stage
Lebanese
poet Kahlil Gibran told us we were “far, far greater than you know and
all is well.” Right. No wonder a character in Stephen Karam’s play—a
2012 New York Drama Critics Circle winner for best play and a finalist
for the Pulitzer Prize for Drama—thinks differently. “Never before,” the
character notes in the LA premiere of Karam’s truly contemporary
masterpiece, “has bad writing been so richly rewarded.”
Joseph Douaihy (Adam Silver) is the son of Lebanese immigrants who
have pounded that quote into his head his entire life. Raised by his
recently departed devout Maronite Christian father and his aged, quickly
failing uncle (Jack Laufer), Joseph has listened patiently to the
persistent family legend that the Douaihys are directly descended from
Gibran, leading them to expect a lot from him and his teenage brother
Charles (Braxton Molinaro). The fact that both brothers are gay is a bit
of an issue in their household, especially when Uncle Bill moves in
with them after their father’s death—something he sees as watching over
them, while the brothers believe they are watching over him as his
health quickly deteriorates.
Karam’s arrestingly on-target tale
careens recklessly from high comedy to intense melodrama, heightened by
director Michael Matthews’s expert, finely nuanced balancing act, as
well as a supremely game and gifted cast able to maneuver the twists and
turns along the way with consummate ease. Despite Uncle Bill’s
continuous demands that the boys live up to the ideals set forth by
their illustrious possible ancestor, if there is a god, he certainly
does not seem to want to reward them for their efforts to remain pure.
As the family’s woes accumulate like trash in a dumpster behind a
high-rise, it wouldn’t be hard to imagine Joseph giving up and giving
in, but he is buoyed by one irrepressible trait: his undeniable sense of
humor and unearthly ability to take on life’s continuously daunting
daily trials as best he can.
Silver is the superglue that holds the entire production together,
giving his Joseph a tremendous sense of patience and adaptability as he
deals with his mysterious debilitating illness and the fact that he has
not fully come to terms with his anti-Maronite sexuality—evident, as his
far more flamboyant younger brother observes, since he dresses like a
lumberjack. When Joseph meets a sweetly engaging young reporter (Erik
Odom), there’s a glimmer of hope, but even that is not meant to be.
Instead, Joseph must patiently endure the continuous taunts of his often
obnoxious brother, and the whines and incessant pontificating of his
cranky old uncle, all the while dealing with his crazed benefactor
(Tamara Zook), an uber-needy book merchant who sees the Douaihy’s story
as fodder for acting as agent for a bestseller based on their ordeals.
Zook is manically hilarious, bringing well-needed levity to the
proceedings while still making her audience want to throw her under a
bus at the earliest opportunity—as does the family of her character’s
late husband, people she also dogs ruthlessly. “I don’t want the fact
that we’re estranged to keep us from seeing each other,” Gloria
observes, indicating just how out of touch she is. And when she disrupts
the school board hearing deciding the future of a young and promising
athlete (Mychal Thompson) indirectly responsible for the death of
Joseph’s father, who swerved his car to avoid the deer decoy placed in
the middle of the road as a prank against a rival team, Zook is at her
wild, no-holds-barred best.
The cast is completed by the
addition of durable stage veterans Ellen Karsten and Irene Roseen, who
appear as a variety of nurses, ticket clerks, and school board members,
each character a fresh joy to observe. And when, at the play’s end,
Roseen assays a brand new character, a former teacher of Joseph’s who is
also trying to heal in a physical therapy office, the real message of
Karam’s bittersweet masterwork emerges: the resiliency of the human
spirit no matter what this often surprisingly cruel life might toss in
our paths. The good die young, they say, but that’s surely not always
true. Sometimes they just go on despite the odds stacking up before
them, something to be celebrated with all the charm and wonder Karam and
this production honors admirably.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
February 16, 2015
Jesus Christ Superstar
DOMA Theatre Company at MET Theatre
The
singular feature of this vest-pocket staging by the DOMA Theatre
Company—and the most compelling reason for attending—is the timeless
score by composer Andrew Lloyd Webber and lyricist Tim Rice. Which is to
say that the MVPs for director Marco Gomez are musical director Chris
Raymond and his four performing colleagues, in whose hands the
through-sung rock opera commands the playing space full throttle.
Sitting at his keyboard on a platform upstage right, Raymond
establishes a propulsive urgency that never falters. What gets served up
is, of course, somewhat thinner than the symphonic orchestration we all
grew up with on the original concept album, but it manages to evoke
those classic sounds while rocking and buzzing on its own, more intimate
terms.
Raymond is to be further congratulated for vocal management, with a
hat tip to sound designer Julie Ferrin, who keeps the words clear
without overwhelming us with noise. Among the standouts are Jeremy
Saje’s growling, heavy metal Judas; Renee Cohen’s sweetly lamenting Mary
Magdalene; the Pontius Pilate of Kelly Brighton, reckless and mournful
in turn; and Nate Parker’s Jesus, who hits high notes (“Go!”; “See how I
die!”) few previous Christs in my experience have nailed so well. (No
pun intended.)
Though I already possess three previous Superstar
albums, if the DOMA folks made a recording I would gladly own it, to
admire again how much commitment and moxie they bring to the semi-sacred
Webber/Rice party.
I just wish the rest of the production were anywhere near as compelling.
Gomez’s conceit is that Jesus’s Passion is happening in the here and
now of celebrity mania. Among voguing debs and preening queens with
cellphones and selfies, Jesus is natty in a club-worthy white linen
suit, while the oily Sanhedrin are in black suits and ties like the
Droogs in A Clockwork Orange.
The entrance to Jerusalem is celebrated not with leafy fronds but with
mobile devices attached to wooden rods or “narcissi-sticks,” as I
believe they’re called. (Such a perfect choice for Palm Pilot Sunday.)
These halfhearted, sophomoric ideas don’t hurt much; neither do they
help. They get mostly discarded by the end, anyway, as the Crucifixion
switches to Jesus in his traditional loincloth and the keening women in
long robes. What goes wrong isn’t the concept but the execution—the
disconnect between what’s being said and what’s being done.
Is no one listening to what
they’re singing? (Julie Ferrin maybe did her work too well.) “Why are
you obsessed with fighting?” Jesus challenges his disciples, who are
actually obsessed at that moment with nothing more than posing and
cooing. “Try not to get worried,” Mary Magdalene advises the Master, “I
shall soothe you, calm you and anoint you,” yet Jesus at that moment
couldn’t be a cooler cucumber as he saunters through the nitery, basking
in general adulation. There’s nothing subversive about this club dude,
and no hint of a threatened Establishment among the priesthood; they’re
too busy flirting with the crowd to be upset with Jesus anyway. So the
plot literally makes no sense, a fact that, let the record note, didn’t
seem to bother the whooping opening night crowd one iota.
Speaking of sauntering, Jesus isn’t the only one. Saje and Brighton
are, as noted, singing their guts out, but both are allowed to just
shamble around aimlessly, without physical engagement. It doesn’t help, I
suppose, that Pilate sports a little pencil mustache and eyepatch like
the gigolo who always loses Ginger in the Astaire-Rogers musicals; or
that this is the first Judas in my experience who’s the spitting image
of Zach Galifianakis.
The point is that acting—even in a rousing rock musical—happens with
the whole body, not just with the singing voice, and the physical act of
emoting is consistently absent from the MET stage. To be fair, Parker
does a good job physicalizing the scourging in Act Two. But where was he
in Act One?
Drama is also undercut by the lame
use of an overhead central balcony: The Pilate-Jesus confrontation has
no juice when the procurator is hovering 8 feet overhead, nor can
Jesus’s pushing some guy and pulling down a little banner convey an
attack on the temple heretics down below.
And really, someone ought to tell the ensemble members that they’re not appearing in No, No, Nanette.
Whether they’re supposed to be anguished disciples, fierce zealots, or
spiteful tormentors, they bring the same grinning, shine-it-on glee to
every occasion. Angela Todaro has overchoreographed the numbers with
leaps and cartwheels and spins as if this were a Biblical Newsies,
such that after a while you just have to throw up your hands and give
into it, or just enjoy the music and ignore the rest. Which I did.
Let’s give the last curtain call
to Raymond; second keyboard Yuhong Ng; bassist Graham Chapman; guitarist
Michael Abraham; and Logan Shrewsbury, mighty on drums. At the MET,
they are the true saviors.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
February 14, 2015
Hellman v. McCarthy
Theatre 40
When
the late Harold Clurman was directing one of Lillian Hellman’s plays,
one of the cast members asked him what Hellman was saying when they saw
her passionately speaking into his ear at rehearsals. He replied that it
was usually something like, “Tell that goddamn bitch to stop being such
a goddamn bitch.” Hellman was litigious, self-righteous, and seemingly
permanently angry. So it was no surprise that she went off like a
skyrocket when, on an episode of PBS’s Dick Cavett Show, he interviewed critic-novelist Mary McCarthy. She declared that every word Hellman ever wrote, including a, the, and and was a lie.
Though it was obvious to everybody that McCarthy was indulging in
comic hyperbole, Hellman decided to sue her for slander, along with
Cavett, his production company, and PBS. The lawsuit embittered the rest
of Hellman’s life, and McCarthy was bankrupted by the court costs.
Improbably, the feud between the two legendary ladies caught the
attention of the nation, and everybody chimed in about it, from Norman
Mailer up and down, with most siding with McCarthy.
So playwright Brian Richard Mori
had plenty of material to work with, and the production gains extra
glamour by the fact that Dick Cavett agreed to star, playing himself.
The piece is beautifully played by all involved. Cavett is a bit grayer
and heavier than he once was, but he has retained his comic timing, his
slyly understated wit, and the wicked twinkle in his eye. Flora Plumb
provides an etched-in-acid portrait of Lillian Hellman, capturing her
imperiousness, bad temper, and furious defensiveness.
Marcia Rodd delivers a stylish turn as McCarthy, but the role is far
less fully developed than Hellman’s. And that’s a pity as McCarthy’s
life, in its way, was just as colorful. (As the story goes, McCarthy’s
marriage to critic Edmund Wilson ended when Wilson went to take out the
garbage one evening and never came back.) M. Rowan Meyer is funny and
wonderfully engaging as Hellman’s star-struck, long-suffering gay
caregiver, and John Combs and Martin Thompson shine as the two rival
lawyers.
Mori manages to incorporate a lot
of biographical detail into his script, including Hellman’s long-term
relationship with mystery writer Dashiell Hammett. And he has
persuasively reconstructed a one-on-one meeting between the two furious
ladies. His play goes on a bit too long, and it suffers from the fact
that the real story ended with a whimper, not a bang. The climax of the
conflict never happened because Hellman died, still angry and
embittered, before it was settled.
Director Howard Storm gives the piece an impeccable production, and
Cavett adds interest to the performance by coming on for a Q&A at
the end. When asked how it felt to be playing himself, Cavett joked that
the only thing that bothered him was being second choice for the role.
Review by Neal Weaver
February 11, 2015
The Manor
Theatre 40 at Greystone Mansion
For
the past 13 years, the prolific Theatre 40, now celebrating its 50th
year, has presented a singular environmental experience that leads
theatergoers on a journey through the massive reverberating halls of
E.L. “Ned” Doheny’s Greystone Mansion, the infamous palatial estate
nestled in the hills above Sunset Boulevard in Beverly Hills.
Designed by noted SoCal architect Gordon Kaufmann, Greystone was
completed in 1928 on 12.5 acres of primo real estate with a breathtaking
view of Los Angeles. The property was given to Doheny as a wedding gift
by his incredibly oil-rich father. The original cost to construct the
sprawling 55-room, 46,054-square-foot main house alone was $1,238,378.
Including the maze-like grounds—which originally comprised stables,
kennels, tennis courts, a fire station, gatehouse, swimming pool and
pavilion, greenhouse, lake, babbling brooks, and cascading
waterfalls—the entire estate set the Dohenys back a trifling $3,166,578.
Still, great wealth never seems to guarantee happiness and, on the
night of Feb. 16, 1929, Ned Doheny was shot to death inside his
expansive stone manor house at age 36, victim of an apparent
murder-suicide perpetrated by his longtime personal friend and aide Hugh
Plunket.
Playwright Kathrine Bates, who appears in The Manor
as fictionalized family matriarch Marion MacAlister, has crafted a
clever theatrical experience inspired by the Dohenys’s sad true story,
uniquely performed on the grounds and in the very rooms where the real
events occurred all those years ago. As butler and narrator James
(Daniel Lench) explains to the gathered at the show’s very beginning,
the names have been changed “to protect the guilty.”
The cast appearing as the MacAlister-Dohenys and their close
associates is exceptional throughout. Finding reality and balance while
making themselves heard and trying to seem natural performing in the
mansion’s high-ceilinged, stone-walled echoing chambers cannot be an
easy task, but this veteran ensemble succeeds splendidly.
Director Flora Plumb guides her players (based on the original
staging of this production by Beverly Olevin) to keep the scenes crisp
and uniform in length as the mansion’s three loyal servants (beautifully
played by Lynch, Katherine Henryk, and Esther Levy Richman) lead three
separate groups of audience members from room to room as scenes are
enacted in a loop before them.
Darby Hinton is particularly noteworthy as Charles MacAlister, the
embattled and eventually crushed patriarch who rose from poverty to
unreal wealth and fame. Bates is affecting as his loyal wife, especially
memorable in a late scene with Melanie McQueen as Cora Winston, the
gossipy yet long-suffering wife of a Foghorn Leghorn–style blowhard US
senator (Daniel Leslie) whose gambling debts and crooked deals nearly
leave the MacAlister clan in disgrace and ruin—analogous to the Teapot
Dome scandal, which rocked the administration of President Warren
Harding and almost sent the elder Doheny to prison along with Harding’s
Secretary of the Interior Albert Fall.
John-Paul Lavoisier and Ben Gavin stand out as the MacAlisters’s
doomed son Sean and his executioner Gregory Pugh, subtly bringing into
their rather stereotypical roles, with body language alone, something
perhaps intentionally omitted in Bates’s otherwise worthy adaptation:
the long-rumored reason why Plunkett murdered Ned Doheny, the kind of
relationship people back then referred to as the “love whose name cannot
be spoken.”
The story’s timing, too, has been
changed from history. Here it spans the younger MacAlister’s tenancy in
the manor across 10 years; in actuality, Ned Doheny and his family lived
at Greystone only five months before his murder. This is an
understandable adjustment to make the timeline work in two acts. But,
although much of Bates’s dialogue, especially James’s lyrical opening
and final monologues, is evocative, any viewers with a tad of historical
OCD might wince at conspicuous missteps. These include Cora’s use of
the term “bad-mouthing,” which didn’t come into the American lexicon
until many years later, as well as the moment when Gregory’s
gold-digging shrew of a wife, Henrietta (Sarah van der Pol), enters the
wedding party in her flapper finery singing Dubin & Warren’s “We’re
in the Money,” a song not written until 1933.
The real star of the show here, of
course, is Greystone. There’s something oppressively lonely and forlorn
about the place, a feeling that sinks in and chills your bones while
you follow the actors through the halls and from one jaw-dropping room
to the next, ultimately affording pensive evidence to support the
thought that, as Bates relates, “Tragedy knows no bounds of race, creed,
or social standing.” If indeed, as many people insist is true,
Greystone Mansion is haunted by the restless ghosts of the Doheny
family, hopefully their spirits remain content with the continuing
success of The Manor,
enough at peace to tolerate this fictionalized telling of their
notorious downward spiral in spite of incredible wealth and
privilege—and allow those who experience it to leave for home a tad more
grateful for what they themselves have.
Reviewed by Travis Michael Holder
January 31, 2015
Dame Edna’s Glorious Goodbye: The Farewell Tour
Ahmanson Theatre
Dame
Edna! The mere title and name connote rapier wit, lightly off-color
insults, and self-obsession, in the ultimate unabashed satire of
celebrities’ narcissism, not to mention their closet contempt for the
paying customers. Barry Humphries’s genius creation isn’t a character
anymore; she’s a brand, and the brand is in its usual shape in this
latest and apparently last appearance at the Ahmanson.
This long—rather too long, probably—evening can be highly recommended
to no one who’s ever seen Edna. I mean, how many more chances are you
going to get? And those who are deliriously in love with her shtick
certainly aren’t waiting for the likes of me to give them the high sign;
they’ve likely been and come back already. It’s those of us in the
middle, who enjoy and admire the work yet with a critical eye, who may
find that the timing is just a bit off, the laughter just a bit less
explosive and prolonged.
“I don’t think of this as a show. I
think of it as an intimate conversation between two people, one of whom
is much more interesting than the other.” It’s a good line, as it was
back in 1999 when I first encountered her in The Royal Tour on Broadway. I don’t remember her using it five years later in her next Gotham appearance, Back With a Vengeance,
but her overall playbook hasn’t changed much in each of the
extravaganzas. If Humphries means it, and this really is the farewell
tour,” he’s certainly letting Edna go out true to form.
It goes like this. A film segment introduces us to the “lady” and her
rise. (This year’s is a variation on an E! Channel expose.) We meet her
as she’s accompanied by a few chorus members on halfhearted display,
and then she talks. To the orchestra (“Hello, possums!”), to the
balconies (“Hello, paupers”), and above all to the individuals in the
first five or six rows who look like they’ll end up good targets.
Edna may have a little more trouble hearing spectators’ names than in
the past, but she’s just as sharp in gently tweaking their backgrounds
(“You live in…Pa-coi-ma?”), clothes, and hairstyles, and above all
condescendingly reveling in the adoration she assumes everyone feels for
her. If anyone has the temerity to stand up or fight back, she coolly
blows them away—hecklers beware. A few celebrity names are dropped for
some more snark; the highs and lows of her careers and life are
recollected; and intermission.
After the interval, there’s more
reminiscence and banter with the audience, followed by an extended
segment in which two hapless spectators are brought up on stage to
participate in some sort of elaborate charade. This year’s prank—having
two strangers get married in a ceremony over which Edna officiates—was
pretty great, followed as it was by a live, audible-to-us phone
conversation with the son of the “bride”; though I have to say it never
hit the heights of her most brilliant Ionescopade in 1999, when she had a
spaghetti dinner catered onstage for two patrons and forced them to eat
while we watched and she commented. Talk about turning the tables. (As I
recall—Dame Edna appearances tend to blur in the mind—dinner was
followed by a call to a diner’s unsuspecting babysitter.)
Truth be told, nothing in this Farewell Tour
is fresher than the material from past visits, but who’d expect it to
be? Humphries is turning 81 next month, and traversing the world while
constantly slipping in and out of gowns, a giant purple fright wig, and
layers of makeup must take its toll. He/she is hanging in there, a
little shaky in the pins but every bit as rascally as ever, and
attention must be paid.
For the first time (that I know of, anyway), Humphries steps out of
character at the end to thank everyone for their longtime fandom and
support. It’s a nostalgic, oddly sad moment, as if he were signaling
that this is really, really, the last appearance. If so, Dame Edna is
going out with no need for apologies. She’s made us roar and, in her
slyer potshots at celebrity and fandom, made us think a little as well.
Shake those gladiolas for her, fellas.
Reviewed by Bob Verini
January 31, 2015
Clean Start
Casa 0101 Theater
Playwright-author Josefina Lopez has teamed with television comedy writer Kathy Fischer (The George Lopez Show) to co-write Clean Start.
It’s a situation comedy involving hardworking housemaid Rosario (Ingrid
Oliu), who is supporting her indolent mother, Maria (Marina Gonzalez
Palmier), and infantile middle-aged sister, Blanca (Maria Russell).
Rosario now feels compelled to take in her suddenly bankrupt former
Beverly Hills matron employer Parker Reed (Kim Chase). Directed by
Fischer, Clean Start
has its comedic moments, but it suffers from clunky plotting and
occasionally awkward performances that could have used a bit more time
in rehearsal.
Fischer’s staging is not subtle, striving more for caricature than
for character. Hyper-superstitious Maria and perennially pouty Blanca
chew up the scenery with their disapproving antics at having to share
Rosario and Rosario’s small East LA two-bedroom house with this invading
gringo lady from the Westside. Chase’s Parker also plays it way
over-the-top, pummeling the audience with her privileged posturing. And
when these ladies decide to form a housekeeping crew to service one of
Parker’s former society friends, the action disintegrates into
unappealing slapstick.
Oliu’s Rosario plays understated
straight woman to everyone else’s clowning. Unfortunately, Oliu’s
delivery often lags behind the frenzied outpourings of the other three
ladies. On the plus side, Oliu instills the much needed sense of caring
and humanity essential to making the audience feel there is truly
someone to root for as this new family dynamic takes shape.
Supplying welcome diversion from the ladies is Russian immigrant
handyman Vladimir (Robert Jekabson), who lives in the basement and would
like nothing more than to convince Blanca to come live with him.
Jekabson exudes an innocent enthusiasm that plays well against the
self-serving machinations whirling around him.
The economical production values adequately serve the play,
especially designer Rees Pugh’s multifunctional setting, complemented by
the lighting and sound designs of Sohail E. Najafi and Vincent Sanchez,
respectively. And the quinceañera gown executed by costumer Dandi Dewey
is the best sight gag in the production.
In this post–Bernie Madoff world in which a woman of privilege can suddenly be left destitute, Clean Start
has the thematic bones to be a successful stage farce. With judicious
reworking, this Lopez-Fischer work just might be on to something.
Reviewed by Julio Martinez
January 27, 2015
Time Stands Still
Secret Rose Theatre
Donald Margolies’s sojourn within the lives of two conflicted battlefield journalists, who are attempting to readjust their lives and relationship now that they are separated from the foreign conflicts that originally drew them together, is given a deeply involving up-close-and-intimate outing at Secret Rose Theatre in NoHo.
The play’s title aptly applies to the emotion-rending events that battered the body of photographer Sarah (Presciliana Esparolini) and crippled the psyche of her journalist lover James (Aidan Bristow). Sensitively guided by helmer Vicky Jenson, Esparolini and Bristow offer a finely detailed, emotionally compelling pas de deux as Sarah and James attempt to achieve a level of post-war-zone compatibility as a “normal” couple living in a Brooklyn flat.
Margolies doesn’t supply any feel-good resolutions to the conflicts he sets up. He supplies only struggles, leading to arbitrary decisions. This is a good thing because Sarah and James eventually come at each other with raw nerve-endings and naked souls. Esparolini’s Sarah is combative, fighting the limitations of her bomb-blasted limbs, the sometimes claustrophobic needs of the man she loves, and her own sense that she is not appreciated professionally. Yet she projects a loving soul who truly wants to please James and keep him safe.
Bristow offers an effective portrait of a much more emotionally closeted writer who finally hit a wall of battlefield horror that he could not get past. Now he is slowly coming to terms with a changing agenda about how he wants to live the rest of his life. Bristow’s James seems to bloom as he only too gladly settles into the insignificant everyday pleasures of civilian life.
Supplying well-timed point and counterpoint to this saga are the journalists’ middle-aged editor and longtime friend Richard (Troy Ruptash) and his much younger girlfriend Mandy (Nik Isbelle). This is not an infusion of equals. There is no free-flowing intellectual/aesthetic discourse amongst this quartet. Helmer Jenson admirably achieves a balance among competing agendas and blatant contentiousness, smoothly moving the action forward, solidifying the reality that these four are deeply committed to one another.
Ruptash’s Richard, who at one time had a relationship with Sarah, projects a believable amalgam of heartfelt concern for and editorial detachment from the often demanding Sarah/James duo. Isbelle’s comedically gifted outing as Mandy provides welcome relief, as she undercuts Sarah’s and James’s journalistic highhandedness, telling them people don’t want to read all their “bummer” pieces.
Complementing the proceedings is the original music underscoring of music director Craig Richey. Tim Paclado’s setting certainly realizes the space limitations of an average Brooklyn apartment, but also causes occasional awkward stage movement.
Reviewed by Julio Martinez
January 21, 2015
Blonde Poison
Theatre 40 in the Reuben Cordoba Theatre
Stella
Goldschlag (1922–1994) seems a wildly unlikely protagonist for Jewish
playwright Gail Louw. Goldschlag was a notorious “Jew catcher” for
Hitler’s Gestapo, and it has been estimated that her activities sent 600
to 3,000 Jews to their deaths. She was so efficient at her job that the
Gestapo called her “Blonde Poison.” Louw is certainly no apologist for
Goldschlag. The playwright makes no attempt to exonerate or whitewash
the woman, but she does seek to understand what could have driven
Goldschlag to such monstrous behavior. And, in the end, the portrait is
not an unsympathetic one.
Stella was just coming of age when the Nazis came to power. At first,
she and her parents didn’t perceive the danger that was coming. They
were convinced the German people were too civilized to tolerate for long
Hitler’s barbarous policies. While other Jews were fleeing the country,
the Goldschlags could not believe they were really in danger. By the
time they realized their peril, it was too late. Because Stella was
blonde and beautiful, she was able to pass for an Aryan, at least for a
time, but her parents were not so lucky. They were taken into custody
and slated for deportation to the death camps. It was then she agreed to
work for the Nazis, in exchange for the lives of her parents and
herself. And her career as a Greifer for the Gestapo began. She was
repeatedly assured that the Gestapo never separated families. But they
were lying, and her mother and father were sent to the concentration
camp at Theresienstadt and executed there.
Louw has cast her play in the form
of a solo drama and set it in the more recent past: 1994, shortly
before Stella (Salome Jens) died. She has been asked for an interview by
a journalist she had known in their student days, when he professed his
love for her. But now, as she waits for the journalist to arrive, she
is terrified. And it becomes clear how much she is haunted by her past
and terrified at the prospect of being asked hard questions about it.
The most unanswerable question is why she continued to work for the
Gestapo after the death of her parents. She can’t answer it, even to
herself. She keeps repeating, “I don’t know. I don’t know. I don’t
know.”
As the play unfolds, the details of her life since the war emerge.
When the conflict ended, she found herself pregnant, the result of an
ill-fated love affair. When the Russian troops entered Berlin, she
escaped rape by going into hiding. But when her child was born, she was
deemed an unfit mother because of her wartime activities, the child was
taken from her, and she was sentenced to 10 years in prison as a
collaborator. When she later attempted to meet her child, she was
rejected with fear and loathing. And, perhaps in order to achieve some
sort of absolution, she converted to Christianity.
It’s a harrowing tale, told and
acted with both passion and restraint. The solo drama is essentially an
artificial format: a single woman talking to herself at length about her
past sorrow and malefactions. But Louw is a skillful writer, and Jens
acts the role with such profound conviction that we never question her
reality. Her attempts at understanding and rationalizing her horrendous
past actions seem both credible and moving. Her guilt may be profound,
but so is her suffering.
Director Jules Aaron frames the action with tact and sensitivity, and
a finely invisible hand. Designer Jeff G. Rack has created the handsome
set—though one wonders how Goldschlag could afford such a fine
apartment after all her travails.
Reviewed by Neal Weaver
January 12, 2015